2008
DOI: 10.2514/1.34946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical Erosion of Carbon-Carbon/Graphite Nozzles in Solid-Propellant Rocket Motors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
75
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
75
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…22,28,29,36 However, for the present analyzed conditions, radiation emitted from the wall can be relevant due to the high wall temperatures, the high emissivity of graphite, and the moderate level of convective heat transfer due to the reduced pressure level (10 bar). Therefore, radiation is not considered a significant factor at the nozzle throat and is usually neglected.…”
Section: Ivd Effect Of Wall Radiationmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…22,28,29,36 However, for the present analyzed conditions, radiation emitted from the wall can be relevant due to the high wall temperatures, the high emissivity of graphite, and the moderate level of convective heat transfer due to the reduced pressure level (10 bar). Therefore, radiation is not considered a significant factor at the nozzle throat and is usually neglected.…”
Section: Ivd Effect Of Wall Radiationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The wall temperature must satisfy the surface energy balance and is therefore the result of different factors among which the most important are the flame temperature, the level of erosion rate, and the energy absorption (or release) by the different oxidizing reactions. Finally, oxidizing species such as atomic and molecular oxygen, whose erosion contribution is traditionally neglected for solid fuels 11,12,22,28,29 (due to their negligible presence in the combustion gases), are shown to be important oxidizing species in hybrid rocket engines, contributing on average between 10 and 20% to total erosion. 5(c), it can be seen that the choice of the oxidizer can significantly alter the heat released by the oxidizing reactions: hydrogen peroxide, where the erosion is dominated by chemical attack by water vapor, shows the highest heat of ablation while oxygen, where exothermic oxidizing reactions with atomic and molecular oxygen are significant, shows the lowest heat of ablation.…”
Section: Iva Effect Of Propellant Combinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high temperature fluid flow in the inner contour of the nozzle system creates a soaring thermomechanical stresses through the liner cross section. This degrades the nozzle throat and widens the throat area of cross section [6]. This phenomenon causes a reduction in thrust and nozzle operational efficiency.…”
Section: Structure Description Of Hot Zone Assemblymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interface region of the fiber/matrix and the defective regions of the composite are more prone to ablation. This is due to the lower activation energy and high reactivity of the defective region in the composite system [64,65]. The ablation always developed along the direction of interface-to-fiber and interface-tomatrix due to the high oxidization tendency of the interface region.…”
Section: Ablative Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(17) for the three reactions are taken from Ref. [20,23] and are listed in Table 1. The total erosion rate of carbon due to the surface heterogeneous reactions is:ṁ…”
Section: Iie Thermochemical Ablation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%