2002
DOI: 10.1080/10473220290096087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical Exposure and Risk Assessment at Workplaces--Modeling Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study confirmed that the most challenging tasks for respondents were to assess the risk posed by chemicals, biological factors, and perceived stress, this being especially the case for professionals working in the health care centers (Lehtola, 2005; Mäkinen, 2003; Mäkinen et al, 2002; Pääkkönen et al, 2003; Rantanen & Pääkkönen, 2000; Rappaport et al, 1993; Vainio et al, 2005). Also their suggestions for improvements with regard to biological factors and perceived stress were implemented by client enterprises more seldom than the other suggestions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present study confirmed that the most challenging tasks for respondents were to assess the risk posed by chemicals, biological factors, and perceived stress, this being especially the case for professionals working in the health care centers (Lehtola, 2005; Mäkinen, 2003; Mäkinen et al, 2002; Pääkkönen et al, 2003; Rantanen & Pääkkönen, 2000; Rappaport et al, 1993; Vainio et al, 2005). Also their suggestions for improvements with regard to biological factors and perceived stress were implemented by client enterprises more seldom than the other suggestions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Occupational health professionals have stated that chemicals and mental load factors were the most difficult areas to assess (Lehtola, 2005; Pääkkönen, Rantanen, Jokitulppo, & Palmroos, 2003; Rantanen & Pääkkönen, 2000; Vainio et al, 2005). Many other studies have noted that even experts have difficulty in assessing the exposure of risks and the estimation between homogenous groups varies extensively (Mäkinen, 2003; Mäkinen, Hämäläinen, Forsman, & Liesivuori, 2002; Rappaport, Kromhout, & Symanski, 1993; Vainio et al, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%