2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.05.090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical interferences when using high gradient magnetic separation for phosphate removal: Consequences for lake restoration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a wide sampling range of non-polymeric adsorbents. Hydrated ferric oxides (Pan et al, 2009, You et al, 2015, You et al, 2016, magnetic-based adsorbents (Janos et al, 2013, Lai et al, 2016, de Vicente et al, 2011, layered double hydroxides (Das et al, 2006, Cheng et al, 2009, synthesized minerals (Peleka andDeliyanni, 2009, Chitrakar et al, 2006), hydroxides (Guan et al, 2006), modified clays (Copetti et al, 2016, Reitzel et al, 2013, modified biochars (Jung andAhn, 2016, Li et al, 2016), oxides (Xie et al, 2015, Park et al, 2017, immobilized transition metals (Mahaninia and Wilson, 2015, Ogata et al, 2011, Liu and Zhang, 2015, and nanoparticles (Zheng et al, 2016, Chouyyok et al, 2010, You et al, 2016, Almeelbi and Bezbaruah, 2012, Lai et al, 2016 have been extensively studied for P removal. Many of these materials have shown high P selectivity, high P sorption capacity, environmentally benign, stable under a wide pH range, low cost, fast removal rate even at low P concentrations, or P recovery capabilities.…”
Section: Non-polymeric Adsorbentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is a wide sampling range of non-polymeric adsorbents. Hydrated ferric oxides (Pan et al, 2009, You et al, 2015, You et al, 2016, magnetic-based adsorbents (Janos et al, 2013, Lai et al, 2016, de Vicente et al, 2011, layered double hydroxides (Das et al, 2006, Cheng et al, 2009, synthesized minerals (Peleka andDeliyanni, 2009, Chitrakar et al, 2006), hydroxides (Guan et al, 2006), modified clays (Copetti et al, 2016, Reitzel et al, 2013, modified biochars (Jung andAhn, 2016, Li et al, 2016), oxides (Xie et al, 2015, Park et al, 2017, immobilized transition metals (Mahaninia and Wilson, 2015, Ogata et al, 2011, Liu and Zhang, 2015, and nanoparticles (Zheng et al, 2016, Chouyyok et al, 2010, You et al, 2016, Almeelbi and Bezbaruah, 2012, Lai et al, 2016 have been extensively studied for P removal. Many of these materials have shown high P selectivity, high P sorption capacity, environmentally benign, stable under a wide pH range, low cost, fast removal rate even at low P concentrations, or P recovery capabilities.…”
Section: Non-polymeric Adsorbentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cationized wood residues (Unnithan et al, 2002, iron oxide tailings (Zeng et al, 2004), alum and ferric sludges (Babatunde andZhao, 2010, Song et al, 2011), alkaline fly ash (Cheung and Venkitachalam, 2000), egg-shell waste (Yeddou Mezenner and Bensmaili, 2009), red mud (Huang et al, 2008), blast furnace slag (Oguz, 2004), and waste lime (Siobhan Dunets and Zheng, 2014, Ahn and Speece, 2010)), ion and ligand exchangers (Blaney et al, 2007, Sarkar et al, 2011, Sengupta and Pandit, 2011, Choi et al, 2012, membranes (Park et al, 2017, Luo et al, 2016, Dolar et al, 2011, and adsorbents (i.e. hydrated ferric oxides (Pan et al, 2009, You et al, 2015, You et al, 2016, magnetic-based adsorbents (Janos et al, 2013, Lai et al, 2016, de Vicente et al, 2011, layered double hydroxides (Das et al, 2006, Cheng et al, 2009, synthesized minerals (Peleka andDeliyanni, 2009, Chitrakar et al, 2006), modified clays (Copetti et al, 2016, Reitzel et al, 2013, modified biochars (Jung andAhn, 2016, Li et al, 2016), immobilized transition metals (Mahaninia and Wilson, 2015, Ogata et al, 2011, Liu and Zhang, 2015), polymers (Dimitri et al, 2005, Mahaninia and Wilson, 2016, Hammud et al, 2015, and nanoparticles (Zheng et al, 2016, Chouyyok et al, 2010, You et al, 2016…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This separation technique has been reported in oil-bearing effluent, mine effluent, and some new complex processes, for example in magnetic chemistry processes [112]. SMF has also been applied for the adsorption of organic dyes such as acridine orange [113] congo red [114], for removal fluoride and phosphate [115], eutrophication in lake restoration [116] and to accelerate the coagulation of sewage in bio-system (117]. The treated effluent has high efficiency in terms of separation and can easily allow removal of an adsorbent, which can cause any negative effect at the downstream processing phase.…”
Section: Effects Of Static Magnetic Field On Biological Wastewater Trmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, natural lake waters are complex matrices in which the P removal efficiency is finally controlled by the interactions between coexisting substances/ions, the adsorbate and the adsorbent. Up to now, the statistical approaches applied in experiments with lake water are correlation analysis (Reitzel et al, 2013), simple linear regression (de Vicente et al, 2011) and principal component analysis (de Vicente et al, 2008). Unfortunately, correlation analysis and simple linear regression do not allow to distinguish if each factor by itself is interfering on P removal or if it is a consequence of the high correlation with other factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%