Chemical Investigation of Household Solid Fuel Use and Outdoor Air Pollution Contributions to Personal PM_2.5 Exposures

Abstract

In communities with household solid fuel use, transitioning to clean stoves/fuels often results in only moderate reductions in fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) exposures; the chemical composition of those exposures may help explain why. We collected personal exposure (men and women) and outdoor PM 2.5 samples in villages in three Chinese provinces (Shanxi, Beijing, and Guangxi) and measured chemical components, including water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC), ions, elements, and organic tracers. Source contributions from chemical mass balance modeling (biomass burning, coal combustion, vehicles, dust, and secondary inorganic aerosol) were similar between outdoor and personal PM 2.5 samples. Principal component analysis of organic and inorganic components identified analogous sources, including a regional ambient source. Chemical components of PM 2.5 exposures did not differ significantly by gender. Participants using coal had higher personal/outdoor (P/O) ratios of coal combustion tracers (picene, sulfate, As, and Pb) than those not using coal, but no such trend was observed for biomass burning tracers (levoglucosan, K + , WSOC). Picene and most levoglucosan P/O ratios exceeded 1 even among participants not using coal and biomass, respectively, indicating substantial indirect exposure to solid fuel emissions from other homes. Contributions of community-level emissions to exposures suggest that meaningful exposure reductions will likely require extensive fuel use changes within communities.

An Integrated Workflow Assisted by In Silico Predictions To Expand the List of Priority Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds

“…Based on comprehensive identification, the 39 priority PACs provided more information on additional markers (e.g., picene for coal combustion 62 ) and thus enhanced the source interpretation. Four factors were identified by the U.S. EPA positive matrix factorization (PMF) receptor model, representing coal combustion, vehicle emission, biomass combustion, and petroleum emission by factor fingerprints (Appendix S7).…”

Exploring Sources and Health Risks in Beijing PM2.5 in 2019 and 2020

“…The first factor is dominated by As and SO 4 2− , contributing 42% and 40%, respectively. As is a typical tracer for coal combustion [46], while SO 4 2− is primarily contributed by coal combustion [47]. Factor 2 shows high loadings of NO 3 − (88%), NH 4 + (73%), and SO 4 2− (32%), as well as moderate abundances of OC and EC, which are typical profiles of secondary sources.…”