1991
DOI: 10.1016/s0922-3487(08)70127-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical Mass Balance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Recent studies in the United States show substantial differences between hydrocarbon emissions inventory estimates and measured emission rates from on-road vehicles. 2,3 The CMB receptor model [4][5][6][7][8] has been used to estimate contributions from NMOC sources to ambient levels in urban air. The CMB needs the fractional mass concentration of each NMOC species from each source type (i.e., the source profile).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Recent studies in the United States show substantial differences between hydrocarbon emissions inventory estimates and measured emission rates from on-road vehicles. 2,3 The CMB receptor model [4][5][6][7][8] has been used to estimate contributions from NMOC sources to ambient levels in urban air. The CMB needs the fractional mass concentration of each NMOC species from each source type (i.e., the source profile).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,13 The CMB quantified contributions from chemically distinct source types rather than contributions from individual emitters. Sources with similar chemical and physical properties could not be distinguished from each other by the CMB.…”
Section: Data Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formalized protocol for CMB model application and validation 5,14,15 was applied during this study. This required the application of initial CMB tests designed to select a core set of source profiles and fitting species for the ambient data.…”
Section: Data Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Receptor models that derive profiles from ambient/indoor measurements requires systematic chemically speciated emission profiles from prominent sources that were possible to effect pollutant concentration at receptor for verification (Hopke, 1999;Watson et al, , 2002Brook et al, 2003;Gupta et al, 2007). These source profiles are the fractional mass (abundances ± uncertainty) of measured chemical species relative to primary PM mass of source emissions ) and one of the most important parameters (Pant and Harrison, 2012) to: 1) create chemically speciated emission inventories (Cass and McRae, 1983;Kuykendal et al, 1990;Chow et al, 2004), 2) apportion receptor concentrations to source (Watson et al, 1984(Watson et al, , 1991) and 3) estimate toxic and hazardous pollutant emissions (Chow et al, 2004). Chemical abundance in most of earlier source profiles is accompanied by an uncertainty/standard deviation value that intends to represent the errors/variability of that abundance resulting from differences among separate emitters and between samples taken same/different times from the same emitters; which is essential to CMB runs Chow et al, 2003;Ho et al, 2003;Chow et al, 2004;Tsai et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%