2015
DOI: 10.13005/ojc/310303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical Modification Methods of Nanoparticles of Silicon Carbide Surface (Review)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the diameters measured (25.266 and 35.367 nm for the Si-NPs and G-SiNPs, respectively) were slightly larger than those in the previous study considered (22.9 and 32.2 nm, respectively) [22], the size of the G-SiNPs was observed to be larger than that The particle sizes of the Si-NPs and G-SiNPs were quantitatively compared using DLS. Although the diameters measured (25.266 and 35.367 nm for the Si-NPs and G-SiNPs, respectively) were slightly larger than those in the previous study considered (22.9 and 32.2 nm, respectively) [22], the size of the G-SiNPs was observed to be larger than that of the Si-NPs, owing to the silanization reaction [22,38]. It was confirmed from the structural results that the GPTS with the epoxy group was successfully attached to the surface of the Si-NPs.…”
Section: Structural Features Of G-sinpscontrasting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the diameters measured (25.266 and 35.367 nm for the Si-NPs and G-SiNPs, respectively) were slightly larger than those in the previous study considered (22.9 and 32.2 nm, respectively) [22], the size of the G-SiNPs was observed to be larger than that The particle sizes of the Si-NPs and G-SiNPs were quantitatively compared using DLS. Although the diameters measured (25.266 and 35.367 nm for the Si-NPs and G-SiNPs, respectively) were slightly larger than those in the previous study considered (22.9 and 32.2 nm, respectively) [22], the size of the G-SiNPs was observed to be larger than that of the Si-NPs, owing to the silanization reaction [22,38]. It was confirmed from the structural results that the GPTS with the epoxy group was successfully attached to the surface of the Si-NPs.…”
Section: Structural Features Of G-sinpscontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…The particle sizes of the Si-NPs and G-SiNPs were quantitatively compared using DLS. Although the diameters measured (25.266 and 35.367 nm for the Si-NPs and G-SiNPs, respectively) were slightly larger than those in the previous study considered (22.9 and 32.2 nm, respectively) [ 22 ], the size of the G-SiNPs was observed to be larger than that of the Si-NPs, owing to the silanization reaction [ 22 , 38 ]. It was confirmed from the structural results that the GPTS with the epoxy group was successfully attached to the surface of the Si-NPs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Chemical functionalization of the SiC is commonly performed through the hydroxyl groups via the silanization route, well developed for the surface of SiO 2 . That procedure was successfully applied for monocrystalline SiC, , industry-made SiC NPs, and thermally oxidized porous SiC . Another efficient method of modification and control of colloidal properties of the SiC NPs is a noncovalent bonding of soluble polymers. , Hydrolytically stable grafted layers could be formed on the SiC NPs by thermal decomposition of azo initiators via the interaction of free radicals with unsaturated carbon bonds of SiC surface according to authors’ suggestions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SiCnws can easily agglomerate, and many closed pores are formed in the densification process; thus, they cannot fully provide their strengthening and toughening benefits to the ceramics. Surface modification or the use of dispersants are common to improve the dispersibility of nano-reinforcements [31]. However, both of these methods introduce organic compounds, which may lead to unexpected reactions and product formation during ceramic sintering, affecting the purity and further influencing the performance of the ceramics.…”
Section: J U S T a C C E P T E Dmentioning
confidence: 99%