1996
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/47.10.1475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical regulation of gas exchange and growth of plants in drying soil in the field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
47
0
7

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
1
47
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In response to water deficit, the increased ABA concentrations in stomata are the result of not only synthesis and redistribution of ABA within leaves, but also synthesis and export from roots (Davies and Zhang 1991;Dodd et al 1996). Taken together, our results suggested that ABA may play an important role in regulating Al-resistance of soybean, as for how ABA modulated these processes is in progress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…In response to water deficit, the increased ABA concentrations in stomata are the result of not only synthesis and redistribution of ABA within leaves, but also synthesis and export from roots (Davies and Zhang 1991;Dodd et al 1996). Taken together, our results suggested that ABA may play an important role in regulating Al-resistance of soybean, as for how ABA modulated these processes is in progress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Thus, our results are consistent with previous studies showing that ABA plays a critical role in the negative regulation of stomata (Dodd, 2003) and has a predictable negative relationship with g s (Duan et al, 2007). However, modes of stomatal behavior are too complex to be explained by ABA alone (Liang and Zhang, 1999), and the sensitivity of stomata to ABA varies considerably according to environmental factors, such as temperature, leaf water potential and atmospheric [CO 2 ], ionic composition of epidermal strip, incubation solutions and the presence of other hormones (Dodd et al, 1996). These results may well explain why the D + ABA treatment under HL shows greater , drought effect; P (S) , shade effect; P (ABA) , ABA effect; P (D×S) , drought × shade interaction effect; P (D×ABA) , drought × ABA interaction effect; P (S×ABA) , shade × ABA interaction effect; P (D×S×ABA) , drought × shade × ABA interaction effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is essential to measure cytokinin content at the site of action (the bud), this tissue may not be the most sensitive indicator of changes in plant CK status. By analogy, soil-drying-induced changes in abscisic acid concentrations are detected earlier in the xylem sap than in the bulk leaf (Dodd et al 1996). The bud tissue we analysed all participated in the growth response but consisted of several cell types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%