2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.0c00421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical Shift Tensors of Cimetidine Form A Modeled with Density Functional Theory Calculations: Implications for NMR Crystallography

Abstract: The principal components of the 13 C chemical shift tensors for the ten crystallographically distinct carbon atoms of the active pharmaceutical ingredient cimetidine Form A have been measured using the FIREMAT technique. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations of 13 C and 15 N magnetic shielding tensors are used to assign the 13 C and 15 N peaks. DFT calculations were performed on cimetidine and a training set of organic crystals using both plane-wave and cluster-based approaches. The former set of calcul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
49
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
3
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[21,23] The present study demonstrates that the P6/mmm structure is also incompatible with 13 tensor principal values which shows that the expected error for a pure phase material is approximately ± 3.3 ppm. [42] In contrast the best fit candidate structures for COF-5 have errors of ± 5.7-6.0 ppm. This outcome is consistent with experimental 13 C tensor data that represent an average of differing principal values from three phases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[21,23] The present study demonstrates that the P6/mmm structure is also incompatible with 13 tensor principal values which shows that the expected error for a pure phase material is approximately ± 3.3 ppm. [42] In contrast the best fit candidate structures for COF-5 have errors of ± 5.7-6.0 ppm. This outcome is consistent with experimental 13 C tensor data that represent an average of differing principal values from three phases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…High probability crystal structures were selected from among the 52 CSP candidates by calculating the agreement between theoretical and experimental 13 C shift tensors using an approach described elsewhere. [42] The space groups P6/mmm and P31m gave poor agreement with experimental data with rms errors of ± 8.3 ppm and ± 8.7 ppm, respectively and were therefore rejected with high statistical confidence (i.e. 90% confidence).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20] More recently, solid-state NMR methods have advanced to refine molecular structures. [16,[21][22][23] Often such NMR refinements result in only minor changes to structures but, in some cases, these adjustments provide new structural insights. For example, the original diffraction structure for cellulose Ia contained ambiguities at several O-H hydrogen orientations, suggesting that two significantly different hydrogen bonding arrangements were equally probable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemically linking these small chemical building blocks is generally expected to yield potent molecules that may evolve into a drug. [23] In particular, the positions of hydrogen atoms, which are generally determined inaccurately by XRD techniques, can be refined using solid-state NMR and quantum mechanical density functional theory (DFT) calculations to yield precise structures of the compounds. [23] Hence, NMR and XRD techniques combined with DFT calculations are powerful for refining crystal structures of drug building blocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation