2022
DOI: 10.1039/d2dd00030j
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical space: limits, evolution and modelling of an object bigger than our universal library

Abstract: Chemical space entails substances endowed with a notion of nearness that comes in two flavours: similarity and synthetic reachability. What is the maximum size for the chemical space? Is there...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
(231 reference statements)
1
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are shown on the right-hand side of Fig. 6: some of the formally sp 2 carbons are very similar to diamond-like environments, suggesting that these are in fact dangling-bond sp 3 environments, further corroborated by their high local energies. This kind of structure is not made as obvious in the SOAP map in Fig.…”
Section: Embedding and Visualisationmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are shown on the right-hand side of Fig. 6: some of the formally sp 2 carbons are very similar to diamond-like environments, suggesting that these are in fact dangling-bond sp 3 environments, further corroborated by their high local energies. This kind of structure is not made as obvious in the SOAP map in Fig.…”
Section: Embedding and Visualisationmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The vast size of compositional and configurational chemical space means that physical experiments will quickly reach their limits for these tasks. [1][2][3] Digital "experiments", powered by large datasets and machine learning (ML) models, provide high-throughput approaches to chemical discovery, and can help to answer questions that their physical counterparts on their own can not. [4][5][6][7] However, because ML methods generally rely on large datasets rather than on empirical physical knowledge, they require new insight into the methodology itself -one example in this context is the active research into interpretability and explainability of ML models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this seems unlikely given the exponential growth of the CS, doubling its size about each 16 years 6 , if the chemical community sets up to diversify the known chemistry at the historical speeds it has done it, as discussed in ref. 44 , it may be possible in a matter of two decades to change the shape of the PS. But there are some caveats.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[36] large biases stemming from the lack of structural and chemical diversity in the available data. These biases, ultimately of anthropogenic nature, [39,40] lead unfortunately to a poor generalization error. In fact, even if the error in test sets is of the order of 20-30 meV atom −1 , the actual error during high-throughput searches can be easily one order of magnitude larger if the available training data is not representative of the actual material space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%