1975
DOI: 10.1002/chin.197529135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ChemInform Abstract: THE TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE OF THE RATIO K(D)/K(C) FOR ETHYL RADICALS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7. First, the dark sector may couple to the visible sector, communicating the visible sector supersymmetry breaking to the dark sector [129][130][131][132][133], as shown in the left panel of Fig. 7.…”
Section: A Hidden Sector Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…7. First, the dark sector may couple to the visible sector, communicating the visible sector supersymmetry breaking to the dark sector [129][130][131][132][133], as shown in the left panel of Fig. 7.…”
Section: A Hidden Sector Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where F and M are the SUSY-breaking F -term and vev of the messenger field, respectively (see [135] for a review), α i ≡ g 2 i /(4π) are the SM gauge couplings, and C i are the quadratic Casimir invariants. If the messengers are likewise charged under a dark gauge group, U (1) X , supersymmetry breaking is communicated to the DM sector with strength [129,136]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is not surprising, as at energies above ∼100 GeV energy losses limit the number of sources that contribute to the electron cosmic ray spectrum; the cosmic ray electron spectrum at energies above a few hundred GeV is, therefore, likely to be dominated by only a small number of nearby sources. As a result, stochas-tic variations in the distribution of supernova remnants are expected to lead to local departures from the average cosmic ray spectrum found throughout the Milky Way (which may very well be a simple power-law) [26,69]. When the Fermi electron+positron spectrum is taken in combination with the positron fraction as measured by AMS, it is clear that more very high energy cosmic ray electrons are required than would be predicted using a simple power-law extrapolated from the low-energy spectrum.…”
Section: Annihilating Dark Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much beneath an MeV, astrophysical and cosmological constraints allow only dark matter with ultra-weak couplings to quarks and leptons [38]. Between these boundaries (MeV − TeV), simple models of dark matter can account for its observed abundance through either thermal freeze-out or non-thermal mechanisms [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54]. The conventional argument in favor of weak-scale ( 100 GeV) dark matter -that its annihilation through Standard Model (SM) forces alone suffices to explain the observed relic density -is dampened by strong experimental constraints on dark matter with significant couplings to the Z or Higgs bosons [12,55] and by the absence to date of evidence for new SM-charged matter at the LHC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%