“…While studies using resting-state fMRI have suggested that the rat DMN is comprised of the RSC, Cg, and PrL (Gozzi and Schwarz, 2016; Hsu et al, 2016; Ji et al, 2018; Lee et al, 2021; Liang et al, 2018; Lu et al, 2012; Osmanski et al, 2014; Oyarzabal et al, 2022; Paasonen et al, 2018; Peeters et al, 2020a; Tu et al, 2021b, 2021a; Xu et al, 2022), such coupling has not yet been demonstrated at the neuronal scale. Our findings using static time-averaged functional connectivity analysis are in general agreement with prior literature, showing strong coupling between RSC, Cg, and PrL in the anesthetized rat brain (Gozzi and Schwarz, 2016; Hsu et al, 2016; Ji et al, 2018; Lee et al, 2021; Liang et al, 2018; Lu et al, 2012; Osmanski et al, 2014; Oyarzabal et al, 2022; Paasonen et al, 2018; Peeters et al, 2020a; Tu et al, 2021b, 2021a; Xu et al, 2022), as well as anesthetized mouse brains (Belloy et al, 2021; Coletta et al, 2020; Ferrier et al, 2020; Gozzi and Schwarz, 2016; Grandjean et al, 2017, 2020; Gutierrez-Barragan et al, 2019; Liska et al, 2015; Mandino et al, 2022; Stafford et al, 2014; Vanni et al, 2017; Whitesell et al, 2021). Additionally, our analysis revealed that RSC, Cg and PrL exhibit similar time-locked neuronal activity patterns while the AI displays neuronal antagonism with these regions in relation to fMRI-derived DMN activation and deactivation.…”