2020
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.591083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemokines as Drivers of the Autoimmune Destruction in Type 1 Diabetes: Opportunity for Therapeutic Intervention in Consideration of an Optimal Treatment Schedule

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter aspect is consistent with other reports (Muller et al, 2021;Tang et al, 2021;Wu et al, 2021) and provides a rationale to focus our subsequent analyses on the earlier 48-h time point. Here, a broad assessment of inflammation-associated TCS proteins (92 analytes) revealed a notably restrained inflammatory response involving the chemokines CXCL10 and CXCL11 (previously implicated in T1D pathogenesis; Christen and Kimmel, 2020;Homann, 2015) but only marginal levels of IFNg (a potent inducer of CXCL10/11) and minor downregulation of multiple proteins associated positively and negatively with b cell survival and diabetes development (Bhandage et al, 2018;Hanson et al, 2014;Kondegowda et al, 2015;Liadis et al, 2007;Mellado-Gil et al, 2011;Vendrell and Chacon, 2013;Figures 1E and 1F).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The latter aspect is consistent with other reports (Muller et al, 2021;Tang et al, 2021;Wu et al, 2021) and provides a rationale to focus our subsequent analyses on the earlier 48-h time point. Here, a broad assessment of inflammation-associated TCS proteins (92 analytes) revealed a notably restrained inflammatory response involving the chemokines CXCL10 and CXCL11 (previously implicated in T1D pathogenesis; Christen and Kimmel, 2020;Homann, 2015) but only marginal levels of IFNg (a potent inducer of CXCL10/11) and minor downregulation of multiple proteins associated positively and negatively with b cell survival and diabetes development (Bhandage et al, 2018;Hanson et al, 2014;Kondegowda et al, 2015;Liadis et al, 2007;Mellado-Gil et al, 2011;Vendrell and Chacon, 2013;Figures 1E and 1F).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In addition, findings of a previous study suggested that blocking of CXCL10 can impede the expansion of peripheral Ag-specific T cells and hinder their migration to the islet microenvironment ( 90 ). Furthermore, the CXCL10 blockade aborts Ag-specific injury of β cells in the islet microenvironment and abrogates T1DM ( 91 ). In this regard, it was shown that, after the treatment of CXCL10 DNA vaccination (pCAGGS-CXCL10), the spontaneous diabetic mice could induce the production of anti-CXCL10 Ab and inhibit the occurrence of spontaneous diabetes in vivo ( 92 , 93 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This drives their migration to sites of inflammation [ 73 ], such as CXCL9 and CXCL10 producing islets [ 61 ]. While studies on the expression of CXCL10 in serum of pre-diabetic at risk individuals or patients with T1D showed divergent results, the vast majority of studies both in humans and mouse models showed enhanced CXCL10 levels related to T1D (summarized in [ 34 . In line with these results, the beta cell-specific expression of CXCL10 caused islet infiltration in T1D-resistant mice [ 153 ], while its blockade delayed the disease in NOD mice [ 134 ] and the combination therapy with anti-CD3 antibody lead to persistent remission in different mouse models of T1D [ 101 ].…”
Section: Chemokinesmentioning
confidence: 99%