2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.04.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemoreduction for retinoblastoma. Analysis of tumor control and risks for recurrence in 457 tumors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
103
2
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
103
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Vitreous seeds and subretinal fluid at diagnosis are known to be associated with a high chemoreduction failure rate. 3,17,18 Because the vitreous cavity and subretinal space are relatively avascular, they may not have sufficient access to chemotherapeutic agents. Failure to control disease in children with bilateral retinoblastoma may lead to the need for EBRT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vitreous seeds and subretinal fluid at diagnosis are known to be associated with a high chemoreduction failure rate. 3,17,18 Because the vitreous cavity and subretinal space are relatively avascular, they may not have sufficient access to chemotherapeutic agents. Failure to control disease in children with bilateral retinoblastoma may lead to the need for EBRT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 A more recent analysis of 457 consecutive retinoblastomas by our group has focused on individual tumor control with chemoreduction with or without focal tumor consolidation. 42 Those tumors treated with chemoreduction alone showed recurrence in 45% by 7 years of follow-up, whereas those treated with chemoreduction plus thermotherapy, cryotherapy, or both showed recurrence in only 22% by 7 years (Table 7). This suggests that tumor consolidation following chemoreduction is the best approach to prevent ultimate recurrence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not by chance, given this situation, that the most important advances in retinoblastoma, have been realised in the field of the clinical diagnosis and treatment, 84 with no substantial contribution of the genetic investigations and speculations. 85,86 There might be several explanations for this curious phenomenon, including the interests of scientific/academic lobbies, and those of the major drug companies who presently are the main funding resource of genetic research, worldwide, with the consequent hunt for grants in search of the genetic causes of cancer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%