1985
DOI: 10.1086/628935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cherts of the Barberton Greenstone Belt Interpreted as Products of Submarine Exhalative Activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The usual explanation for the poor fossil record of early Earth, especially in the case of the Archean cherts, is that these cherts must have been secondarily silicified (Paris et al, 1985). This would mean that primary calcification destroyed the morphological record of early life and left only unidentifiable carbonaceous traces for subsequent silicification (chertification).…”
Section: Implication For the Early Fossil Recordmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usual explanation for the poor fossil record of early Earth, especially in the case of the Archean cherts, is that these cherts must have been secondarily silicified (Paris et al, 1985). This would mean that primary calcification destroyed the morphological record of early life and left only unidentifiable carbonaceous traces for subsequent silicification (chertification).…”
Section: Implication For the Early Fossil Recordmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Precambrian cherts have often been considered as chemical precipitates from a warm and silica-saturated Archean ocean [Siever, 1992]. However, an increasing number of studies have provided evidence that the cherts are, in fact, ''replacement cherts,'' that is, sediments (often volcanoclastic) that have been post-depositionally silicified by pervasive hydrothermal or diagenetic fluids [de Wit et al, 1982;Paris et al, 1985;Sugitani, 1992;Kato and Nakamura, 2003;Hofmann, 2005;Orberger et al, 2006c; see also Perry and Lefticariu, 2003]. Post-depositional alteration [Rouchon et al, 2004], and metamorphism [Boyd and Philippot, 1998] of these cherts can also alter their primary biogenic N (and C) isotopic signature [Dauphas and Marty, 2004;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This carbonate precipitation occurred by the reaction between bicarbonate ions in the circulating seawater and Ca, Mg, Fe, and Mn in the oceanic crust Kato, 2000, 2001). Such carbonatized greenstone has been commonly recognized in the Early Archean greenstone belts other than the Warrawoona Group (e.g., Knauth and Lowe, 1978;Paris et al, 1985;Barley and Groves, 1987), indicating that seafloor hydrothermal carbonatization was a common and major process of the carbonate precipitation in the Early Archean. The question arises when the carbonate precipitation changed from the Early Archean style to modern one.…”
Section: Carbonate Precipitation On the Early Archean Earthmentioning
confidence: 93%