1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70035-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chest Pain Associated With Cocaine: An Assessment of Prevalence in Suburban and Urban Emergency Departments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of cocaine use is similar to values previously reported 24 and does not compromise generalizability of the study. In summary, these findings support the dual use of CK and troponin testing as an effective technology for evaluating outpatient veterans who present belatedly with symptoms concerning for ACS.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…The prevalence of cocaine use is similar to values previously reported 24 and does not compromise generalizability of the study. In summary, these findings support the dual use of CK and troponin testing as an effective technology for evaluating outpatient veterans who present belatedly with symptoms concerning for ACS.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…5 The proportion of these episodes that are related to cocaine use is difficult to determine 6 ; however, in one study from 1 suburban hospital and 3 urban hospitals, cocaine use was documented in 17% of patients under the age of 60 years who were admitted with chest pain. 7 The evaluation of chest pain after cocaine use is complicated by the unreliability of the ECG for diagnosing myocardial infarction 8 and the low rate of myocardial infarction among patients with suggestive symptoms. 9 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 We were unable to document the timing, amount, route of ingestion, or incidence of chronic use of cocaine in our patients. However, all routes of ingestion result in high blood concentrations of cocaine, and the occurrence of MI is unrelated to the amount of the ingestion, the route of administration, or the frequency of use.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 92%