1966
DOI: 10.1021/jf60146a024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chicken Flavor Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1967
1967
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pH value of 5.8 for white-meat fraction B is the same as that reported for raw breast-muscle slurry by Minor et al (1966), but the 7.2 value for dark-meat B is higher than the 6.1 they report for raw leg-muscle slurry. This difference may partially account for the less pronounced chicken flavor in dark 5, since Verified by Ehrlich's reagent (Smith, 1953).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The pH value of 5.8 for white-meat fraction B is the same as that reported for raw breast-muscle slurry by Minor et al (1966), but the 7.2 value for dark-meat B is higher than the 6.1 they report for raw leg-muscle slurry. This difference may partially account for the less pronounced chicken flavor in dark 5, since Verified by Ehrlich's reagent (Smith, 1953).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The lack of detectable chicken flavor in the recombined sample of dark meat could have been due to dilution of flavor components or to change in their relative proportions during fractionation and reconstitution. Minor et al (1966), however, point out that chicken leg muscle belongs organoleptically in the red-meat category, having a pronounced beef-like odor when mixed with water and warmed. Consequently, a predominance of "meaty, brothy" characteristics would be expected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…What the effect on the flavour of the cooked meat would be from changes in amino acid concentration of the magnitude revealed by the present analyses is difficult to decide. Taurine, the individual acid present at by far the largest concentration (1-9 mg/g in leg muscle, very much less in breast muscle, Table 2) has been reported to possess " a serumy, somewhat astringent taste " (Kazeniac, 1961), and Minor, Pearson and Stine (1966) found that the addition of taurine (0-25 mg/ml) to a model mixture imparted a serumy flavour and changed its character from a resemblance to broth made from breast meat to both from leg meat. Our own tests showed a just detectable astringent after-taste at a concentration of 20 mg/ml in water at neutral or slightly acid pH, but breast meat cooked with the addition even of this large amount of taurine was not noticeably different in flavour.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%