Childbearing After Repartnering Among Russians, Russians Migrants and Estonians: Prevalence and Determinants

Churilova, Elena; Zakharov, Sergei; Puur, Allan; Rahnu, Leen; Luule, Sakkeus

doi:10.2139/ssrn.3092208

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Average measures, such as CTF, might be unable to reveal the changes in childbearing at different parities. Notwithstanding the significant interest in the increasing over-representation of MPF among those with fewer socioeconomic resources, the influence of MPF on socioeconomic fertility differentials has not been incorporated into research on cohort fertility trends (see Beaujouan and Solaz 2008;Thomson et al 2012;Churilova et al 2017). To substantiate the role of partnership dynamics, for this study we distinguished measures derived from all births from measures that exclude MPF births.…”

Section: Socio-economic Status Gender and Fertilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Parity disparity: Educational differences in Nordic fertility across parities and number of reproductive partners

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Most research on trends in socio-economic fertility differences has focused on cohort total fertility and on women. This study aimed to analyse how cohort trends in parity-specific fertility differ across educational segments for men and women and what role multi-partner fertility plays in these trends. We used Finnish and Swedish register data on cohorts born in 1940-73/78. The main analyses used parity progression ratios, comparing ordinary ratios with similar ratios using births to first reproductive partners only. Among the low and medium educated, we observe strengthening parity polarization across cohorts, with increases in both childlessness and births of order three or higher, the latter largely reflecting increases in multi-partner fertility. Highly educated men and women more often have exactly two children. We demonstrate that cohort total fertility can mask significant parity-specific trends across educational groups and that changes in multi-partner fertility can play a part in cohort trends in socio-economic fertility differentials.

show abstract

Section: Socio-economic Status Gender and Fertilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Parity disparity: Educational differences in Nordic fertility across parities and number of reproductive partners

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The average rates of cohort fertility might be unable to tap changes in childbearing at different parities. Notwithstanding great interest in the increasing overrepresentation of MPF among those with fewer socioeconomic resources, the influence of MPF on socioeconomic fertility differentials has not been incorporated into research on cohort fertility trends (But see Beaujouan & Solaz 2008;Churilova et al 2017;Thomson, Winkler-Dworak, Spielauer, Prskawetz). To substantiate the role of partnership dynamics this study distinguishes rates derived from all births from rates that exclude MPF births.…”

Section: Socioeconomic Status Gender and Fertilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Parity disparity: Educational differences in Nordic fertility across parities and number of reproductive partners

Jalovaara¹,

Andersson²,

Miettinen³

2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Most research on trends in socioeconomic fertility differences focus on cohort total fertility.This study asks how cohort trends in parity-specific fertility differ across educationalsegments for men and women, and what role multi-partner fertility plays in these trends. Thestudy used Finnish and Swedish register data on cohorts born in 1940–1973/1978. The mainanalyses use parity progression ratios. Ordinary ratios were contrasted with ratios on births tofirst reproductive partner. Among low- and medium-educated persons we observe paritypolarization, where both childlessness and higher parity (3+) births increase, largelyreflecting increases in multi-partner fertility. Highly educated men and women more oftenhave exactly two children. We demonstrate that cohort total fertility can mask significantparity-specific trends across educational groups, and that changes in multi-partner fertilitycan be a part and parcel of cohort trends in socioeconomic fertility differentials.

show abstract

Childbearing After Repartnering Among Russians, Russians Migrants and Estonians: Prevalence and Determinants

Cited by 2 publications

References 15 publications

Parity disparity: Educational differences in Nordic fertility across parities and number of reproductive partners

Parity disparity: Educational differences in Nordic fertility across parities and number of reproductive partners

Parity disparity: Educational differences in Nordic fertility across parities and number of reproductive partners

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About