2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.02.007
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Childhood adversity and adult depression among the incarcerated: Differential exposure and vulnerability by race/ethnicity and gender

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Whites with fewer adverse childhood experiences had extremely high likelihood of commitment of a serious person/property offense (Odds Ratio = 4.87 for one adverse childhood experience and Odds Ratio = 4.29 for two adverse childhood experiences), yet African Americans and Hispanics with between three and five adverse childhood experiences had reduced likelihood of serious person/property offending. Although non-white offenders experience generally more disadvantaged backgrounds [24,25,26,38] than whites, that was not the case in these current data. Whites had the highest mean adverse childhood experiences (Mean = 2.43, Standard Deviation = 1.71), followed by Hispanics (Mean = 2.01, Standard Deviation = 1.42) and African Americans (Mean = 1.94, Standard Deviation = 1.41), and these group differences were significant ( F (3, 2520) = 17.00, p < 0.0001).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whites with fewer adverse childhood experiences had extremely high likelihood of commitment of a serious person/property offense (Odds Ratio = 4.87 for one adverse childhood experience and Odds Ratio = 4.29 for two adverse childhood experiences), yet African Americans and Hispanics with between three and five adverse childhood experiences had reduced likelihood of serious person/property offending. Although non-white offenders experience generally more disadvantaged backgrounds [24,25,26,38] than whites, that was not the case in these current data. Whites had the highest mean adverse childhood experiences (Mean = 2.43, Standard Deviation = 1.71), followed by Hispanics (Mean = 2.01, Standard Deviation = 1.42) and African Americans (Mean = 1.94, Standard Deviation = 1.41), and these group differences were significant ( F (3, 2520) = 17.00, p < 0.0001).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…For instance, in the United States there is extraordinary heterogeneity of background experiences among delinquents in addition to sharply divergent local life circumstances and socioeconomic backgrounds by race and ethnicity [22,23,24,25,26], which have been demonstrated to affect adverse childhood experience wherein juvenile offenders residing in more disadvantaged communities evidence greater exposures. Prior criminological research has shown that disaggregated analyses by race and ethnicity are a fruitful way to understand different pathways of offending [27,28,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A prior study by Roxburgh and MacArthur (2014) used the same dataset as this study and identified differential effects of childhood adversities on depression by race and sex. In the present study, white women were more likely to develop virtually all of the substance misuse outcomes with the exception of crack cocaine and heroin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Confounders were also considered based on analyses shown in Table 2. Previous studies have shown differences by age (Brown et al, 2013a; Schussler-Fiorenza Rose et al, 2014; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and 2009), gender (Kelly-Irving et al, 2013; Liu et al, 2013; Roxburgh and Macarthur, 2014), race/ethnicity (Brown et al, 2013a; Schussler-Fiorenza Rose et al, 2014; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and 2009; Roxburgh and Macarthur, 2014), income (Brown et al, 2013a; Schussler-Fiorenza Rose et al, 2014), education (Schussler-Fiorenza Rose et al, 2014; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and 2009), marital status (Brown et al, 2013a; Schussler-Fiorenza Rose et al, 2014), and insurance status (Brown et al, 2013a), associated with ACEs. Statistically significant differences by age (Brown et al, 2013b; Palmetto et al, 2013), sex (Clark et al, 2014; Cui et al, 2013; Lovestad and Krantz, 2012; Menard et al, 2014), race/ethnicity (Palmetto et al, 2013; Clark et al, 2014; Lipsky et al, 2012; Stephenson et al, 2011), income (Brown et al, 2013b; Edwards et al, 2014), education (Brown et al, 2013b; Stephenson et al, 2011), marital status (Brown et al, 2013b; Cui et al, 2013), and insurance status (Brown et al, 2013b) were associated with IPV.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%