Childhood Age and Associations Between Childhood Metabolic Syndrome and Adult Risk for Metabolic Syndrome, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Carotid Intima Media Thickness: The International Childhood Cardiovascular Cohort Consortium

Abstract

BackgroundThere is paucity of knowledge concerning the specific age in youth when the associations of metabolic syndrome (MetS) begin to be operative. Thus, we investigated the relation of age to the associations of childhood MetS with adult MetS, type 2 diabetes mellitus and high carotid intima‐media thickness.Methods and ResultsFive thousand eight‐hundred three participants were analyzed in 4 cohort studies (Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns, Bogalusa Heart Study, Princeton Lipid Research Study, Insulin Study). International cutoffs and previously used 75th percentile cutoffs were used for children to define MetS and its components. Mean follow‐up period was 22.3 years. Logistic regression was used to calculate risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Childhood MetS and overweight were associated with over 2.4‐fold risk for adult MetS from the age of 5 years onward. Risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus was increased from the age of 8 (risk ratio, 2.6–4.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.35–6.76 and 1.12–7.24, respectively) onward for the 2 childhood MetS criteria based on international cut‐off values and for childhood overweight. Risk for high carotid intima‐media thickness was significant at ages 11 to 18 years in relation to childhood MetS or overweight (risk ratio, 2.44–4.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.55–3.55 and 2.55–5.66, respectively). Continuous childhood MetS score was associated with adult MetS from the age of 5, with type 2 diabetes mellitus from the age of 14 and with high carotid intima‐media thickness from the age of 11 years onward.ConclusionsAdult MetS was predicted by MetS in childhood beginning at age 5. However, adult type 2 diabetes mellitus and subclinical atherosclerosis were not predicted by childhood data until after age 8. Body mass index measurement alone at the same age points provided similar findings.

Peak oxygen uptake cut‐points to identify children at increased cardiometabolic risk – The PANIC Study

“…The reason for this is that CRF scaled by BM combines the information from these two measures such that both decreased CRF and increased weight, and/or body fat content are associated with increased cardiometabolic risk. Proposing age‐specific cut‐points for CRF scaled by BM using the ratio standard method offers clear diagnostic utility in identifying children at increased cardiometabolic risk, which tracks well from childhood into adulthood . There was a linear decrease in cardiometabolic risk with increasing categories of V̇O 2peak scaled by BM.…”

“…We defined elevated cardiometabolic risk as ≥1 standard deviation above the mean of the cardiometabolic risk score in the present study population. The rationale for using this approach is the existing evidence on the ability of a continuous cardiometabolic risk score in children to predict cardiometabolic diseases in adulthood . The clustering of risk factors may also provide a more sensitive and clinically more relevant evaluation of increased cardiometabolic risk than using individual risk factors, and may compensate for day‐to‐day fluctuations observed in the levels of individual risk factors …”

No additional long‐term effect of group vs individual family intervention in the treatment of childhood obesity—A randomised trial

“…Metabolic syndrome was defined using the MEtSPed definition, which included overweight or obesity status according to Cole plus ≥2 of the following four risk factors (systolic or diastolic BP ≥90th percentile, triglycerides ≥1.7 mmol/L, HDL cholesterol ≤1.03 mmol/L and fasting glucose ≥5.6 mmol/L) …”

“…15 Fasting blood samples were collected by biomedical engineers percentile, triglycerides ≥1.7 mmol/L, HDL cholesterol ≤1.03 mmol/L and fasting glucose ≥5.6 mmol/L). 15,19…”

Protocol for digital intervention for effective health promotion of small children—A cluster randomized trial

“…Early childhood is a meaningful period for building a strong basis for good health (Baker & Stabile, ; Landale, McHale, & Booth, ). Health behaviours during early childhood are associated with the current and future physical health of the child (Kim, Lee, & Lim, ; Koskinen et al., ; Talvia et al., ; Telama et al., ; Umer et al., ). Parents play a key role in promoting healthy behaviours in children (Carson, ; Hinkley, Jo Salmon, Okely, Hesketh, & Crawford, ; Hodges, Smith, Tidwell, & Berry, ; Mistry et al., ; Yee, Lwin, & Ho, ).…”