The Family in Early Modern England 2007
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511495694.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Childless men in early modern England

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, men fashioned a sense of self and a public reputation from their biological and social role as fathers: even childless men. 13 This work also demonstrates that historians must explore men's role in the home with care and not assume that their lack of domestic labours includes failure to be involved with 14 For instance, it was argued that 19th-and 20th-century fatherhood was culturally 'invisible' because closer attention to motherhood and the mother-child bond resulted in attention to fatherhood waning. 15 This is challenged by Julie Marie Strange and Laura King who show that when motherhood undergoes visual and textual 'intensification' in public discussion, so, too, does fatherhood.…”
Section: Gender and Parentingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As such, men fashioned a sense of self and a public reputation from their biological and social role as fathers: even childless men. 13 This work also demonstrates that historians must explore men's role in the home with care and not assume that their lack of domestic labours includes failure to be involved with 14 For instance, it was argued that 19th-and 20th-century fatherhood was culturally 'invisible' because closer attention to motherhood and the mother-child bond resulted in attention to fatherhood waning. 15 This is challenged by Julie Marie Strange and Laura King who show that when motherhood undergoes visual and textual 'intensification' in public discussion, so, too, does fatherhood.…”
Section: Gender and Parentingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Couples who were unable to conceive might take comfort from preachers who placed greater emphasis on the importance of companionship rather than reproduction within marriage, and whilst impotency and barrenness were subjects of satirical mockery in print, amongst the mass of the population being aff licted with such a condition was regarded as a misfortune rather than a disaster. 10 Evans, Berry and Foyster focused on biological fatherhood, but others have examined the social aspects of the role. Anthony Fletcher has argued that amongst the 17th-century gentry, most fathers were benign patriarchs, working to ensure deference and obedience from their children but also displaying real love and affection for them, and with the impact of sensibility and romanticism, the tone and emotional content of fatherhood softened further after 1750.…”
Section: Fatherhoodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, their otherwise exemplary consideration of the extent to which fatherhood contributed to men's gender identity and patriarchal positions draws only on married men who were childless. 19 As David Hussey and Margaret Ponsonby point out, where the unmarried man has been studied, he has recurrently been cast in terms of 'distinct archetypes', among them one that presupposed a man seeking matrimony. 20 Amanda Vickery's chapter devoted to 'men alone' in her analysis of what it meant to be 'at home' in Georgian England, to take another example, argued that '[d]omesticity for bachelors was fragmented and effortful, while their manhood remained in suspense', this image of suspension between marital states implying the inevitable anticipation of marriage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%