2017
DOI: 10.1121/1.4982043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Children's and adults' perception of questions and statements from terminal fundamental frequency contours

Abstract: The present study compared children's and adults' identification and discrimination of declarative questions and statements on the basis of terminal cues alone. Children (8-11 years, n = 41) and adults (n = 21) judged utterances as statements or questions from sentences with natural statement and question endings and with manipulated endings that featured intermediate fundamental frequency (F) values. The same adults and a different sample of children (n = 22) were also tested on their discrimination of the ut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Listeners integrate information across acoustic dimensions when interpreting the location of an intonational boundary (Beach, 1991 ; de Pijper & Sanderman, 1994 ; Streeter, 1978 ), and English speakers place greater weight on the durational than the pitch cues (Jasmin et al, 2021 ). Prior evidence regarding categorical perception of phrase boundaries is mixed: Some researchers have reported a discrimination peak aligned with a category boundary (Remijsen & van Heuven, 1999 ; Saindon et al, 2017a , b ; Schneider & Lintfert, 2003 ), whereas other researchers reported finding no discrimination peak (Falé & Faria, 2006 ). Future work could investigate the existence of discrete multidimensional categories for phrase boundaries using a paradigm similar to that used in the current paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Listeners integrate information across acoustic dimensions when interpreting the location of an intonational boundary (Beach, 1991 ; de Pijper & Sanderman, 1994 ; Streeter, 1978 ), and English speakers place greater weight on the durational than the pitch cues (Jasmin et al, 2021 ). Prior evidence regarding categorical perception of phrase boundaries is mixed: Some researchers have reported a discrimination peak aligned with a category boundary (Remijsen & van Heuven, 1999 ; Saindon et al, 2017a , b ; Schneider & Lintfert, 2003 ), whereas other researchers reported finding no discrimination peak (Falé & Faria, 2006 ). Future work could investigate the existence of discrete multidimensional categories for phrase boundaries using a paradigm similar to that used in the current paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence for categorical perception of suprasegmentals has been mixed. It has been reported for F0 peak alignment (Kohler, 1987 ) and high versus low boundary tones (Remijsen & van Heuven, 1999 ; Saindon et al, 2017a , b ; Schneider & Lintfert, 2003 ). However, other papers have reported finding no discrimination peak for high versus low boundary tones (Falé & Faria, 2006 ) or emphatic (vs. neutral) accents (Ladd & Morton, 1997 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The nonsignificant differences in pitch change across tasks and sentence types could be attributed to the fact that, in Inuktitut, tonal movements are restricted to the end of the sentence; tonal changes throughout the utterance do not encode grammatical information, this information being encoded by a rich morphology. Admittedly, tonal variations at the beginning of the utterance, albeit a cue for sentence type (see Saindon et al 2017a), are redundant in English, since grammatical (changes in word order, do-support) and tonal information (final boundary tones) provide sufficient cues. We believe, however, that it was important to begin by analyzing sentence types to establish a descriptive basis for the uses of pitch in this bilingual population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrastingly, English-speaking children acquire focus marking much earlier (by the age of five), while still lagging in comprehension (Wells, Peppé & Goulandris, 2004). Furthermore, children acquire sensitivity to the overall contours of their language early (Frota, Butler & Vigário, 2013), but only master the functions of such contours later (Ota, 2016; Saindon, Cirelli, Schellenberg, van Lieshout & Trehub, 2017).…”
Section: Children's Acquisition Of Prosodymentioning
confidence: 99%