Previous evidence demonstrates that power is mentally represented as vertical space by adults. However, little is known about how power is mentally represented in children. The current research examines such representations. The influence of vertical information (motor cues) was tested in both an explicit power evaluation task (judge whether labels refer to powerless or powerful groups) and an incidental task (judge whether labels refer to people or animals). The results showed that when power was explicitly evaluated, vertical motor responses interfered with responding in children and adults, i.e., they responded to words representing powerful groups faster with the up than the down cursor key (and vice versa for powerless groups). However, this interference effect disappeared in the incidental task in children. The findings suggest that children have developed a spatial representation of power before they have been taught power-space associations formally, but that they do not judge power spontaneously.Keywords: children; power; space; representation 3
The Spatial Representation of Power in ChildrenAn essential question that has received much attention within the domain of cognitive psychology is how abstract concepts are mentally represented. In the social domain, one of these abstract concepts is power. Systematic research over the last decade has demonstrated representation of power as magnitude, specifically spatial magnitude (Chiao et al., 2009;Chiao, 2010;Giessner & Schubert, 2007; Jiang et al., 2015ab;Mason, Magee, & Fiske, 2014;Schubert, 2005;Zanolie et al., 2012).However, little is known about how power is mentally represented in children. The current research examines the spatial representation of power in children.
Modal Representations of PowerIn the psychological literature, power has been defined as the ability or capacity to influence others through the control of resources (Galinsky, Gruenfeld, & Magee, 2003;Keltner, Gruenfeld, & Anderson, 2003). When we talk about power in our daily life, we often use vertical information in our language. For example, leaders who supervise their employees have "high" status, or are "up" in the hierarchy, whereas the employees are at the "lower" levels of the hierarchy. Simply put, power is often metaphorically understood, presented, and communicated nonverbally as vertical height in physical space: "control is up, lack of control is down" (Lakoff, 1987;Lakoff & Johnson, 1980). Understanding the spatial representation of power is important because of its broad implications and use in communication in relations ranging from the interpersonal to societal. It concerns mate selection (Meier & Dionne, 2009) and leadership in organizations (Giessner & Schubert, 2007). For 4 example, Meier and Dionne found that males preferred female pictures which were presented near the bottom of the screen, whereas females preferred male pictures which were presented near the top of the screen, presumably because powerful males and powerless females are seen desirable in ...