2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00705-018-4002-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chimeric GII.3/GII.6 norovirus capsid (VP1) proteins: characterization by electron microscopy, trypsin sensitivity and binding to histo-blood group antigens

Abstract: GII.3 and GII.6 noroviruses (NoVs) are similar in several aspects, including the presence of a short sequence insertion in the P2 domain of the major capsid protein (VP1) and trypsin susceptibility of VP1-containing virus-like particles (VLPs). In this study, we generated two constructs with the S or P domains of VP1 from GII.3 and GII.6 NoV strains exchanged (GII.3S/GII.6P and GII.6S/GII.3P), and the resultant chimeric capsid proteins were expressed from recombinant baculoviruses. The assembly of VLPs was con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Determination of trypsin concentration. Some authors suggest that VP1 capsid proteins need to be digested for proper virus infection (Ma et al, 2018;Tan and Jiang, 2006). Intestinal villi-enriched preparation was plated in 96-well cell culture plates with 100 µl of MEM without fetal bovine serum (FBS).…”
Section: Rna Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determination of trypsin concentration. Some authors suggest that VP1 capsid proteins need to be digested for proper virus infection (Ma et al, 2018;Tan and Jiang, 2006). Intestinal villi-enriched preparation was plated in 96-well cell culture plates with 100 µl of MEM without fetal bovine serum (FBS).…”
Section: Rna Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a response to the urgent demand for more accurate and reliable detection, here the gene segments of NoV GII was specifically employed as the model target [39]. In spite of their high sensitivity, earlier reports like electron microscopy [40,41], immunology-based detection (radioimmunoassay (RIA) [42,43], enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) [44,45]) and nucleic acids biomarkers detection based on gene amplification techniques (PCR [46,47], nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) [48,49], LAMP [50,51]) always lack of specificity and false positive results can easily arise. Herein, the powerful exponential amplification of LAMP results in ultrasensitive NoV gene detection with a detection limit of 30 copies, while the HCR gives rise to very good specificity and reliable signal changes in all kinds of readouts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%