2017
DOI: 10.17520/biods.2017135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

China’s zoogeographical regionalization based on terrestrial vertebrates

Abstract: China's previous zoogeographical regionalization designations were delineated according to expert knowledge and experience. However, these previous designations have limited application in wildlife conservation and management because of a lack of quantitative footing. Additionally, there are still significant differences in the ecological components of some of the basic units. In order to meet the needs of wildlife protection and management, especially the needs of the Second National Survey on Terrestrial Wil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To update and verify these data, we conducted systematic field surveys within each subregion of the China Himalayas from 2011 to 2018 and collected species distribution data from regions where data are relatively sparse (Hu, Jin, et al, 2017; Hu, Zhou, et al, 2017; Hu et al, 2014, 2018, 2021; Li et al, 2013; Pan et al, 2016; Wang et al, 2020). These surveys are under the framework of the Second National Survey on Terrestrial Wildlife Resources in China (Gao et al, 2017) and currently represent the most comprehensive survey of terrestrial vertebrates in China Himalayas. Details on the field sampling procedures are described in Appendix S2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To update and verify these data, we conducted systematic field surveys within each subregion of the China Himalayas from 2011 to 2018 and collected species distribution data from regions where data are relatively sparse (Hu, Jin, et al, 2017; Hu, Zhou, et al, 2017; Hu et al, 2014, 2018, 2021; Li et al, 2013; Pan et al, 2016; Wang et al, 2020). These surveys are under the framework of the Second National Survey on Terrestrial Wildlife Resources in China (Gao et al, 2017) and currently represent the most comprehensive survey of terrestrial vertebrates in China Himalayas. Details on the field sampling procedures are described in Appendix S2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are more observed bird species in southwest and eastern China, while less in northeast and north China. The spatial distribution of bird species is similar to that of wider biodiversity in China (39), which shows latitudinal gradients. However, the distribution of some birds has changed.…”
Section: Prefecture-level Spatial Distribution Of Bird Biodiversitymentioning
confidence: 64%
“… Kreft and Jetz (2013) questioned the validity of this realm because they regarded it as just a biogeographical transition zone between the Palearctic and Oriental realms. According to their taxa etho-ecological characteristics, the Sino-Japanese realm boundaries are generally clustered with the Oriental realm ( Kreft and Jetz 2010 , Song et al 2016 , He et al 2017 , Gao et al 2017 , He et al 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eight Chinese zoogeographic regions, based on geographic, climatic, and vegetation characteristics ( Gao et al 2017 , He et al 2017 ), were used for the bio-geographical analyses: Northeast China, North China, Nei Mongol-Xinjiang, Qinghai-Tibet, South China, Central China, Southwest China and the Taiwan region (Fig. 1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%