China's Development Finance: What Issues for Reporting and Monitoring Systems?

Abstract

This article explores the implications of China's rise for global reporting and monitoring systems (RMSs) in the field of development cooperation. Beyond its fast-growing -albeit still modest -foreign aid, China has emerged in the last decade as a globally pre-eminent source of development finance. While China's endeavours are comparable to previous rising powers that strived to build linkages into global commodity chains and to participate in advanced industrial and technology value creation, what makes China distinct from OECD capital providers is its unprecedented scale, cohesive state-market banking and enterprise institutions, and extensive utilisation of official finance for risk-taking. This poses an existential crisis for DAC's ODA reporting system, helping to precipitate a wide-ranging renovation process. Hence, China's intentions and capacities regarding the reporting and monitoring of its development finance have a potentially formative influence on the development of a new, wider DAC reporting system and on other international RMSs in the development finance field as well.

Why Give it Away When You Need it Yourself? Understanding Public Support for Foreign Aid in China

“…In China the influence of public opinion on foreign policy formulation has evolved over time (Reilly, 2011). At the same time, the Chinese government has become increasingly consultative in making foreign policy (Williams, 2014) and has exhibited a willingness to cooperate with DAC members (Xu & Carey, 2014). However, because of limited data availability and political sensitivities, there are few studies of the impact of public opinion on foreign affairs in China.…”

Debunking Myths about China: The Determinants of China’s Official Financing to the Pacific

“…Although China's development efforts have a traditional aid component that adheres to the criteria stipulated by the OECD-DAC, China's development financing extends well beyond its official aid programme (Xu and Carey 2014). In fact, the lion's share of Beijing's official financing is not actually ODA, but instead export credits, non-concessional loans, or financing used to foster Chinese investment (Bräutigam 2011).…”

Post‐2015 Global Governance of Official Development Finance: Harnessing the Renaissance of Public Entrepreneurship

“…Emerging economies, especially China, have been pivotal to the prospects for the potential expansion of large‐scale and long‐term official finance. China, now the world's leading capital exporter with an explicit ‘going global’ agenda, is taking the lead to establish a new set of China‐based multilateral development financing institutions, including the Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa (BRICS) New Development Bank in Shanghai and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and the Silk Road Fund in Beijing (Xu & Carey, , ). China's Export‐Import (ExIm) Bank and China Development Bank (CDB) provide large volumes of financing to developing countries and support outward foreign investment. CDB is the largest development bank worldwide.…”