China's One‐Child Policy and the Empowerment of Urban Daughters

Abstract

Urban daughters have benefited from the demographic pattern produced by China's one–child policy. In the system of patrilineal kinship that has long characterized most of Chinese society, parents had little incentive to invest in their daughters. Singleton daughters, however, enjoy unprecedented parental support because they do not have to compete with brothers for parental investment. Low fertility enabled mothers to get paid work and, thus, gain the ability to demonstrate their filiality by providing their own parents with financial support. Because their mothers have already proven that daughters can provide their parents with old age support, and because singletons have no brothers for their parents to favor, daughters have more power than ever before to defy disadvantageous gender norms while using equivocal ones to their own advantage. [Keywords: gender, family, fertility, demography, China]

Why study abroad? Sorting of Chinese students across British universities

“…Between 2000 and 2013, China's gross domestic product per capita underwent a sevenfold increase from $949 to $6807 (World Bank 2014). Not only do Chinese families invest heavily in children's education in general (Cai et al 2010), but also the coming of age of the singleton generationproduct of the one-child policy -means that extended families such as grandparents and relatives pool their resources to invest in the only child in the family (Fong 2002). However, the costs associated with studying in British universities above £20,000 per annum are high even for middle-class family incomes (ca.…”

Women rising as half of the sky? An empirical study on women from the one-child generation and their higher education participation in contemporary China

“…Studies at the individual family level complement a larger body of work on the changing demographic policy on women's opportunities and aspirations. Research demonstrates a shift in parental values and perceptions through investment plans in education and engagement with their children's study (Kim et al 2016;Kim and Fong 2014;Wang and Fong 2009;Fong 2004Fong , 2002Tsui and Rich 2002). There used to be the situation where large families invested little in each child or prioritized their resources in favor of sons.…”

Center-Based Care in the Context of One-Child Policy in China: Do Child Gender and Siblings Matter?

“…China launched a series of family planning policies after the establishment of the socialist regime in 1949, which eventually evolved into the widely known one-child policy in 1979 (Attane 2002;Fong 2002;Riley 2004;Zhai and Gao 2008). In 1982, fertility control and family planning became constitutional duties for couples (Attane 2002).…”

“…Evidence from many Asian and African societies characterized by son preference, such as China, Korea, Vietnam, India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nepal, Egypt, Morocco, and Tunisia, shows that boys are more likely to receive breast-feeding, quality food, education, child care, immunizations, and medical treatment than girls (Haughton and Haughton 1995;Hossain and Glass 1988;Li 2004;Mishra et al 2004;Obermeyer and Cardenas 1997;Park and Cho 1995;Short et al 2001). In previous generations in China, many parents avoided investing family resources in daughters and sometimes even forced daughters to drop out of school and work to financially support their brothers' education (Fong 2002). Furthermore, if family resources were scarce, parental investments often heavily focused on the eldest son even if he had younger brothers.…”