2018
DOI: 10.1186/s11782-018-0027-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chinese employees’ leadership preferences and the relationship with power distance orientation and core self-evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Past research has shown that TL plays a critical role in the success of Chinese SMEs (Lin and Sun, 2018). Chinese employees prefer leaders who exhibit the traits of TL (idealized consideration, IS, LI, and II), for instance, acting as a role model, selflessness (Farh and Cheng, 2000), avoiding the use of abusive power, setting a good example, and working for employee well-being (Dunfee and Warren, 2001;Cheng et al, 2004;Xiaoxia and Jing, 2006;Chen et al, 2012;Lin and Sun, 2018;Su et al, 2019).…”
Section: Transformational Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past research has shown that TL plays a critical role in the success of Chinese SMEs (Lin and Sun, 2018). Chinese employees prefer leaders who exhibit the traits of TL (idealized consideration, IS, LI, and II), for instance, acting as a role model, selflessness (Farh and Cheng, 2000), avoiding the use of abusive power, setting a good example, and working for employee well-being (Dunfee and Warren, 2001;Cheng et al, 2004;Xiaoxia and Jing, 2006;Chen et al, 2012;Lin and Sun, 2018;Su et al, 2019).…”
Section: Transformational Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings answer the call by Zhou et al (2019) to consider Chinese culture in mentoring research. In addition, our study and other pioneering work in the mentoring and traditionality arenas (Wu et al, 2019) can guide future mentoring research to pay attention to cultural factors, especially in high‐context countries such as China, Korea, and Japan (Lin & Sun, 2018; Q. Wang, Liao, & Burns, 2019). Other potential cultural variables such as guanxi (Xin & Pearce, 1996) and Confucian introspection (Z. Wang, Liu, & Ye, 2017) may also create cultural boundary conditions for the effects of mentor values or behaviors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…These findings answer the call by Zhou et al (2019) to consider Chinese culture in mentoring research. In addition, our study and other pioneering work in the mentoring and traditionality arenas (Wu et al, 2019) can guide future mentoring research to pay attention to cultural factors, especially in high-context countries such as China, Korea, and Japan (Lin & Sun, 2018;Q. Wang, Liao, & Burns, 2019).…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This is explained by its advantage in managing time distribution, determining improvement trends, and not taking into account the opinion of others. Three types of leadership are distinguished: moral, benevolent and authoritarian (Lin & Sun, 2018). Studies showed that moral leadership has the greatest impact on interactions, and authoritarian has the least.…”
Section: Contemporary Empirical Studies Of Human Resources` Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%