2016
DOI: 10.1080/17508061.2016.1139803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chinese-language film or Chinese cinema? Review of an ongoing debate in the Chinese mainland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It includes all films from these territories, but also those from the Chinese diaspora; as well as transnational productions which result from collaborations with other film industries that are a result of the effects of globalization across the world. In this sense, we can be said to have moved away from the old but interesting debate between the terms Chineselanguage cinemas and Chinese cinema, reviewed by many authors such as Lu and Yeh (2005: 1-12) and more recently by Sun (2016). We also steer clear of the complex discussion about Chineseness, Chinese identity, and nation in relation to cinema, as Beus (2008) already does, since that goes beyond the objectives of this article.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…It includes all films from these territories, but also those from the Chinese diaspora; as well as transnational productions which result from collaborations with other film industries that are a result of the effects of globalization across the world. In this sense, we can be said to have moved away from the old but interesting debate between the terms Chineselanguage cinemas and Chinese cinema, reviewed by many authors such as Lu and Yeh (2005: 1-12) and more recently by Sun (2016). We also steer clear of the complex discussion about Chineseness, Chinese identity, and nation in relation to cinema, as Beus (2008) already does, since that goes beyond the objectives of this article.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%