2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2106.04874
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chiral control of quantum states in non-Hermitian spin-orbit-coupled fermions

Abstract: While spin-orbit coupling (SOC), an essential mechanism underlying quantum phenomena from the spin Hall effect to topological insulators [1, 2], has been widely studied in well-isolated Hermitian systems, much less is known when the dissipation plays a major role in spin-orbit-coupled quantum systems [3]. Here, we realize dissipative spin-orbit-coupled bands filled with ultracold fermions, and observe a parity-time (PT ) symmetrybreaking transition as a result of the competition between SOC and dissipation. Tu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1, the second term represents a spin-orbit coupling with the inter-spin hopping strength t and the phase η σ φ m between nearest-neighbor sites denoted by nm , where η σ=↑,↓ = ±, and φ m = 0, −π/2, π, π/2 for m = (n x + 1, n y ), (n x , n y + 1), (n x − 1, n y ), (n x , n y − 1), respectively. h (∆) is a complex number and can be regarded as a complex Zeeman field (staggered potential), resulting from the state-dependent atom loss [17,18]. In the following, we set the intra-spin hopping strength t = 1 as the energy unit and a = 1 as the length unit.…”
Section: The Non-hermitian Tight-binding Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1, the second term represents a spin-orbit coupling with the inter-spin hopping strength t and the phase η σ φ m between nearest-neighbor sites denoted by nm , where η σ=↑,↓ = ±, and φ m = 0, −π/2, π, π/2 for m = (n x + 1, n y ), (n x , n y + 1), (n x − 1, n y ), (n x , n y − 1), respectively. h (∆) is a complex number and can be regarded as a complex Zeeman field (staggered potential), resulting from the state-dependent atom loss [17,18]. In the following, we set the intra-spin hopping strength t = 1 as the energy unit and a = 1 as the length unit.…”
Section: The Non-hermitian Tight-binding Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In realistic experiments, the loss cannot be completely avoided due to the coupling of systems to the environment or measurement [11]; for cold atoms, few-body losses play inevitable roles in the preparation of degenerate quantum gases [2] and in the simulation of quantum many-body physics [3]. On the other hand, the non-Hermitian physics attracts increasing attention of almost all branches of physics in recent years [12], where abundant exotic phenomena, such as the spontaneous breaking of the parity-time (PT ) symmetry [13][14][15][16][17][18], the breakdown of the conventional bulk-boundary correspondence [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29], the exceptional topology [30], and the interplay with Anderson localization [31][32][33][34][35][36][37], have been widely exploited both in theory and experiment. As for cold atoms, the experimental techniques are mature to engineer state-dependent atom losses [17,18] and the effective nonreciprocal hoppings [38] of non-Hermitian systems, which are fundamental operations for the construction of a non-Hermitian model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such systems usually exhibit complex band structures with exceptional points or rings . In cold atom systems, non-Hermitian Hamiltonians have been experimentally realized by introducing atom loss [35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. The paritytime (PT ) symmetry breaking has been observed by measuring the population of an evolving state of a system through quench dynamics [35,36,42].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cold atom systems, non-Hermitian Hamiltonians have been experimentally realized by introducing atom loss [35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. The paritytime (PT ) symmetry breaking has been observed by measuring the population of an evolving state of a system through quench dynamics [35,36,42]. However, such a method is very hard to generalize to a generic case without PT symmetry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%