“…The dsDNA sequences were dsDNA 1 (AAAAAAAAAAAA-TTTTTTTTTTTT), dsDNA 2 (ACACACACACAC-TGTGTGTGTGTG), dsDNA 3 (AGAGAGAGAGAG-TCTCTCTCTCTC), dsDNA 4 (ATATATATATAT-TATATATATATA) and dsDNA 5 (CGCGCGCGCGCG-GCGCGCGCGCGC) respectively; Figure S2: The effect embedding time of 1.0 × 10 −5 mol/L of L-Pen embedded in different dsDNA in 0.005 mol/L of K 4 [Fe(CN) 6 ]/K 3 [Fe(CN) 6 ] (contain 0.1 mol/L KCl) solution over a potential range from +0.6 V to −0.2 V, with a scan rate of 50 mV/s and pulse amplitude of 50 mV; Figure S3: Characterization of L-Pen treated by each double-stranded DNA by AGE (a: dsDNA 1 , b: dsDNA 2 , c: dsDNA 3 , d: dsDNA 4 , e: dsDNA 5 , f: dsDNA 1 -L-Pen, g: dsDNA 2 -L-Pen, h: dsDNA 3 -L-Pen, i: dsDNA 4 -L-Pen, j: dsDNA 5 -L-Pen, k: DNA marker); Figure S4: The formation of MIPs/dsDNA via electropolymerization (Scan rate:50 mV/s; cycle number: 15; working potential: 0~0.8 V); Figure S5: The Effect of eluent pH value on MIP/dsDNA sensor recognition of L-Pen; Table S1: DNA base sequences; Table S2: Comparison of performance between this method and other methods for detecting L-Pen. References [ 24 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 ] are cited in the Supplementary Materials.…”