2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-3573-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chitosan grafted SiO2–Fe3O4 nanoparticles for removal of antibiotics from water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An intense band that split into two peaks at 629 and 582 cm −1 present in the spectra of MNPs corresponds to Fe–O bending vibrations 15 . Coating of SiO 2 onto Fe 3 O 4 MNPs was confirmed by the presence of a strong and broad stretching vibration band of the siloxane groups at 1085 cm −1 16 . Grafting of chitosan onto MNPs was confirmed by the bands at 1098, 1387, and 2925 cm −1 which are assigned to C–O, C–N, and C–H stretching vibrations respectively 20,21 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An intense band that split into two peaks at 629 and 582 cm −1 present in the spectra of MNPs corresponds to Fe–O bending vibrations 15 . Coating of SiO 2 onto Fe 3 O 4 MNPs was confirmed by the presence of a strong and broad stretching vibration band of the siloxane groups at 1085 cm −1 16 . Grafting of chitosan onto MNPs was confirmed by the bands at 1098, 1387, and 2925 cm −1 which are assigned to C–O, C–N, and C–H stretching vibrations respectively 20,21 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Silica‐coated Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles were prepared by sol–gel process according to previously reported method 16 . Fe 3 O 4 MNPs (1 g) was dispersed in a mixture of deionized water (225 ml) and EtOH (60 ml) by sonication for 1 h. Then 5 ml of ammonia aqueous solution (20%) and TEOS (1 ml) were added to the mixture at room temperature for and stirred for 12 h to achieve core–shell MNPs (SiO 2 @Fe 3 O 4 MNPs).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the higher adsorption capacity (52.14 mg/g) was recorded at pH 12 which might be due to the electrostatic interaction ( Fig. 8 b ) ( Danalıoğlu et al, 2018 ).
Fig.
…”
Section: Antibiotics Removal By Chitosan Composites-based Adsorbentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…pH Ref. MCsGO CIP 282.9 4-9 ( Wang et al, 2016 ) MACCs CIP 90.01 ( Danalıoğlu et al, 2017 ) MgO/Cs/GO CIP 1111 7 ( Nazraz et al, 2019 ) Fe-CS NCs CIP 142.85 6 ( Rasoulzadeh et al, 2019 ) Cs/BC CIP >76 3 ( Afzal et al, 2018 ) CoFe 2 O 4 /AC@Cs CIP 188.68 5 ( Malakootian et al, 2018 ) Cs/kaolin/Fe 3 O 4 CIP 47.85 6 ( Ma et al, 2014 ) Cs-grafted SiO 2 /Fe 3 O 4 CIP 100.74 12 ( Danalıoğlu et al, 2018 ) Zn(II)–Impregnated Cs/GO CIP 210.96 6.5 ( Rahman and Varshney 2021 ) Cs-EDTA-β-CD CIP 49.37 4-6 ( Zhao et al, 2017 ) Humic acid/BC@Cs CIP 153.00 8 ( Afzal et al, 2019 ) …”
Section: Antibiotics Removal By Chitosan Composites-based Adsorbentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation