2008
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chitosan/nanohydroxyapatite composite membranes via dynamic filtration for guided bone regeneration

Abstract: Chitosan/hydroxyapatite (HA) composite membranes were prepared by the coprecipitation method and a subsequent dynamic filtration and freeze-drying process. The influences of the HA content of the membranes on their phase and morphology, mechanical properties, and bioactivity were investigated. FTIR analysis revealed that chitosan and HA had good miscibility over a wide range of compositions. Needle-like HA nanocrystals with low crystallinity were uniformly embedded in the chitosan matrix. As the HA content was… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
68
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
12
68
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The hydroxyl group (OH) of HAp appeared at 3431 cm -1 . The FTIR results showed that the phosphate groups are the dominant compounds presence of a very small amount of calcium carbonate 23 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The hydroxyl group (OH) of HAp appeared at 3431 cm -1 . The FTIR results showed that the phosphate groups are the dominant compounds presence of a very small amount of calcium carbonate 23 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The method used affects the quality, especially the mechanical strength of the resulting scaffold, which depends on the bond of -NH 2 and -OH groups of chitosan with Ca 2+ hydroxyapatite and the ratio of CTS to Hap. 20,23 CTS/HAp composites are characterized by significantly better mechanical properties than both products individually. The highest compression strength of the CTS/HAp scaffold, 119.86 MPa, was obtained by the use of 30:70 CTS:HAp.…”
Section: Composite Chitosan-hydroxyapatitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 CTS/HAp composites are completely non-toxic and exhibit a significant increase in osteoblast activity and their deposition/penetration of the composite. [19][20][21][22] There are many methods for the synthesis of CTS/HAp, ranging from the simple mixing of natural HAp with CTS by means of freezing, lyophilization and hybridization as well as the use of state-of-the-art methods such as electrospinning. The method used affects the quality, especially the mechanical strength of the resulting scaffold, which depends on the bond of -NH 2 and -OH groups of chitosan with Ca 2+ hydroxyapatite and the ratio of CTS to Hap.…”
Section: Composite Chitosan-hydroxyapatitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has its own disadvantages: autografting often leads to complications in wound healing, additional surgery, donor pain and an inadequate supply of bone to fill the gap [133]. [134]. Very few compounds are classified as bioactive, biodegradable and osteoconductive.…”
Section: Chitosan/hydroxyapatite For Bone/hard Tissue Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%