2022
DOI: 10.1039/d2ma00320a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chitosan- or glycidyl methacrylate-based adsorbents for the removal of dyes from aqueous solutions: a review

Abstract: Dyes have been found in industrial effluent, noting the need for effective treatment. Different processes like filtration, flocculation and adsorption are low-cost, and efficient methods used for the removal of...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 144 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rejection of RR195 was increased from 90 to 94% by embedding the nanocomposite into the PES membrane, with Z-PO 2 0.1 Torr/PES having the greatest rejection of this dye. The difference in rejection between RG19 and RR195 can be related to RG19’s greater molecular size and the membranes’ mean pores that affect the physical sieving mechanism . The improved dye separation efficiency of the embedded membranes is due to the improvement of membrane hydrophilicity, which results in the rejection of organic dye molecules from the surface of the membrane via a hydrophilic–hydrophobic repulsive force. , Clinoptilolite possesses a negative charge.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rejection of RR195 was increased from 90 to 94% by embedding the nanocomposite into the PES membrane, with Z-PO 2 0.1 Torr/PES having the greatest rejection of this dye. The difference in rejection between RG19 and RR195 can be related to RG19’s greater molecular size and the membranes’ mean pores that affect the physical sieving mechanism . The improved dye separation efficiency of the embedded membranes is due to the improvement of membrane hydrophilicity, which results in the rejection of organic dye molecules from the surface of the membrane via a hydrophilic–hydrophobic repulsive force. , Clinoptilolite possesses a negative charge.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, Lead (II) and cadmium (II) are of greater concern on the list of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and has set the maximum permissible limit for Pb as 0.015 mg/l and Cd as 0.005 mg/l in drinking water. [4][5][6][7][8] In contemporary times, heavy metal ion removal from waste water has been employed by several methods such as adsorption, membrane separation, chemical precipitation, electrochemical deposition, ion exchange, oxidation and coagulation with their merits and demerits. Among these methods, adsorption has emerged and predominated due to simplicity, cost effective and highly efficient technique to remove heavy metal ions from contaminated water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the metals can accumulates into human body and it leads to organ (liver, pancreas, kidney and heart etc) damage. Therefore, Lead (II) and cadmium (II) are of greater concern on the list of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and has set the maximum permissible limit for Pb as 0.015 mg/l and Cd as 0.005 mg/l in drinking water [4–8] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Versatile methods of removing organic pollutants as well as unwanted waste materials can cause direct environmental degradation. They can also be the reason for soil pollution as well as water contamination, as several authors point out in their research (54)(55)(56)(57)(58). Therefore, it is necessary to choose sorbents that are safe for the environment Adsorbents are solid substances used in separation of components from fluid mixtures (liquids and gases).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%