2008
DOI: 10.1136/sti.2007.027409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chlamydia trachomatis seroprevalence atlas of Finland 1983-2003

Abstract: Only a few population-based serological studies have been undertaken on C trachomatis epidemiology over time. In Finland the seroprevalence of C trachomatis is decreasing all over the country, albeit with small clusters remaining.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
27
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This might be explained by differences in study population (random sample of the general population vs people accessing healthcare in England) and/or the use of a different CT IgG antibody test (ELISA based on the antigen MOMP vs Pgp3 in England17). The results of another population-based study in which Finnish pregnant women were included and serum IgG antibodies to CT were analysed by a peptide-based enzyme immunoassay test were partly consistent with our results 14. They also found a decreasing CT IgG seroprevalence among women aged 23–28 years between 1983 and 2003, but they also found a decreasing trend in seroprevalence among women aged ≤23 years.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This might be explained by differences in study population (random sample of the general population vs people accessing healthcare in England) and/or the use of a different CT IgG antibody test (ELISA based on the antigen MOMP vs Pgp3 in England17). The results of another population-based study in which Finnish pregnant women were included and serum IgG antibodies to CT were analysed by a peptide-based enzyme immunoassay test were partly consistent with our results 14. They also found a decreasing CT IgG seroprevalence among women aged 23–28 years between 1983 and 2003, but they also found a decreasing trend in seroprevalence among women aged ≤23 years.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In total, 1930 women were included (958 in 1996 and 972 in 2007) and 1246 men (621 in 1996 and 625 in 2007). Assuming a baseline prevalence in 1996 of around 10% (range 5–15%, based on a study by Lyytikäinen et al 14), we calculated that the specified number of samples would enable detection of a 3% change (increase or decrease) from 1996 to 2007 at the level of 80% power (β) and 5% significance level (α).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is interest in using serology to monitor changes in the age-specific anti-C. trachomatis antibody prevalence and to improve understanding of the epidemiology of chlamydial infection. This is a potential method for evaluating the population impact of C. trachomatis control programs (24,32), since it would allow estimates of the changing prevalence of past exposure to C. trachomatis rather than only current infection. However, a prerequisite for this is better-characterized and better-performing assays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in Finland, Lyytikäinen et al (32) studied pregnant women under the age of 29 using a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) based on C. trachomatis-specific peptides derived from the major outer membrane protein (MOMP). However, for wider application, confidence in the sensitivity and specificity of available antibody tests is critical (24).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, over the last two decades, case notifications of Chlamydia-associated infection have steadily increased and, in many countries, exceed rates recorded prior to the implementation of intervention strategies [132] [133] [134]. Norway, Finland, Sweden, and Canada have documented similar trends with an initial decline following the introduction of Chlamydia control programs [132] [135] [136] [137]. In recent years, these countries have witnessed chlamydial rates exceeding those recorded prior to the establishment of surveillance systems.…”
Section: Control Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%