2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.2c06158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chlorination (but Not UV Disinfection) Generates Cell Debris that Increases Extracellular Antibiotic Resistance Gene Transfer via Proximal Adsorption to Recipients and Upregulated Transformation Genes

Abstract: To advance the understanding of antibiotic resistance propagation from wastewater treatment plants, it is important to elucidate how different effluent disinfection processes affect the dissemination of predominantly extracellular antibiotic resistance genes (eARGs). Here, we show that, by facilitating proximal adsorption to recipient cells, bacterial debris generated by chlorination (but not by UV irradiation) increases the natural transformation frequency of their adsorbed eARG by 2.9 to 7.2fold relative to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the interaction mechanisms between POAs and bacteria have not been compared with those of chlorine. It has been reported that strong oxidants with low selectivity (e.g., free chlorine and ozone ,, ) damage the cell surfaces and induce cell lysis, which in turn gives rise to release of intracellular polymeric substances (IPS) (serving as important DBP precursors and membrane foulants) and intracellular antibiotic resistance genes (iARGs). Dukan et al reported that free chlorine was easily consumed by extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) or IPS and, hence, was more difficult to accumulate inside the cell and cause intracellular damage . In contrast, selective oxidants like PAA, with low reactivity with cell membrane and EPS, may diffuse through intact membrane and become accumulated intracellularly, while leaving the bacteria in viable but nonculturable states (VBNC). To date, a systematic comparison between POAs and chlorine has not been demonstrated at a cellular level to evaluate their inactivation mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the interaction mechanisms between POAs and bacteria have not been compared with those of chlorine. It has been reported that strong oxidants with low selectivity (e.g., free chlorine and ozone ,, ) damage the cell surfaces and induce cell lysis, which in turn gives rise to release of intracellular polymeric substances (IPS) (serving as important DBP precursors and membrane foulants) and intracellular antibiotic resistance genes (iARGs). Dukan et al reported that free chlorine was easily consumed by extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) or IPS and, hence, was more difficult to accumulate inside the cell and cause intracellular damage . In contrast, selective oxidants like PAA, with low reactivity with cell membrane and EPS, may diffuse through intact membrane and become accumulated intracellularly, while leaving the bacteria in viable but nonculturable states (VBNC). To date, a systematic comparison between POAs and chlorine has not been demonstrated at a cellular level to evaluate their inactivation mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biofilms in water systems can cause fouling and microbially induced corrosion (MIC), and pathogenic microorganisms harbored within biofilms (e.g., Legionella pneumophila ) pose human health risks; these impacts sum to $3 trillion per year in costs worldwide . Ultraviolet-C (UV-C) irradiation from light-emitting diodes (LEDs) is a chemical-free process that is highly biocidal to planktonic pathogens and has been proven to minimize biofilm formation on surfaces. However, delivering UV-C light to complex surfaces (e.g., drinking water pipes, cooling tower basins, point-of-use devices, biomedical devices) is difficult because optical obstructions lower the UV-C light irradiance from the design value, making the actual UV-C irradiation insufficient to minimize biofilm formation on surfaces …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3−5 However, delivering UV-C light to complex surfaces (e.g., drinking water pipes, cooling tower basins, point-of-use devices, biomedical devices) is difficult because optical obstructions lower the UV-C light irradiance from the design value, making the actual UV-C irradiation insufficient to minimize biofilm formation on surfaces. 6 Previous research has shown that UV-C irradiation can reduce the level of biofilm formation. Torkzadeh et al concluded that UV-C at 254 nm and 50 μW/cm 2 reduces biofilm formation at 20 °C by 95% over 48 h; an even lower UV-C irradiance is required to achieve the same reduction at low temperature (<10 °C) due to the lower bacterial growth rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] An effective disinfection method is necessary to protect the environment and the general population from antibiotic-resistant harmful bacteria prevalent in wastewater. 4,5 A variety of techniques, including ozone treatment, ultrasound, adsorption, and membrane-based filtration, have been devised by researchers to remove ARB from aqueous solutions. 6 In particular, photodynamic inactivation using photosensitizers has been steadily studied over the past decade to solve these problems and protect water sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%