1985
DOI: 10.1016/0304-4211(85)90005-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chlorophyll fluorescence and water relations of salt-stressed plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Salinity reduced leaf chlorophyll content in grapevine, bean, barley, citrus and mangrove (Downton and Millhouse, 1985), spinach , and Acacia saligna (Shaybany and Kashirad, 1978).…”
Section: Plant Responses To Salinitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salinity reduced leaf chlorophyll content in grapevine, bean, barley, citrus and mangrove (Downton and Millhouse, 1985), spinach , and Acacia saligna (Shaybany and Kashirad, 1978).…”
Section: Plant Responses To Salinitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that various partial processes of photosynthesis are affected differently by changes in leaf or chloroplast temperature or water potential (3,5,17,25). Also, there is increasing understanding that the effects of stress on photosynthetic rates can be only partially attributed to stomatal function (11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10). Toxic ions, such as chloride, have been found to accumulate in the leaves under saline conditions and to reduce photosynthesis (Downton & Millhouse, 1985). Whether this leads to the low rates of photosynthesis associated with low stomata!…”
Section: Stomata! Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salinity, therefore, affects plant growth by diminishing the availability of soil water for the plant and increasing the presence of toxic ions (Bernstein, 1975;Gale, 1975;Greenway & Munns, 1980). Photosynthesis in the grapevine is affected by a number of climatic factors (Smart, 1974;Kriedemann, 1977;Sepulveda & Kliewer, 1986) and cultivation practices (Hofacker, 1978;Hunter & Visser, 1988;Archer & Strauss, 1990) and is reduced by salinity (Downton, 1977;Walker et al, 1981;Downton & Millhouse, 1985). In the grapevine, however, variation in salt tolerance is well known with respect to both the rootstock (Sauer, 1968;Downton, 1985;Arbabzadeh & Dutt, 1987) and scion cultivar (Alexander & Woodham, 1968;Groot Obbink & Alexander, 1973;Barlass & Skene, 1981;West & Taylor, 1984).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%