2005
DOI: 10.1515/sg-2005-0042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chloroplast and Total Genomic Diversity in the Endemic Costa Rican Tree Lonchocarpus costaricensis (J. D. Smith) Pittier (Papilionaceae)

Abstract: In Mesoamerica, tropical dry forest is a highly threatened habitat, and species endemic to this environment are under extreme pressure. The tree species, Lonchocarpus costaricensis is endemic to the dry northwest of Costa Rica and southwest Nicaragua. It is a locally important species but, as land has been cleared for agriculture, populations have experienced considerable reduction and fragmentation. To assess current levels and distribution of genetic diversity in the species, a combination of chloroplast-spe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays, long‐distance seed dispersal may not be ensured in many regions of Central Africa where hunting has drastically decreased populations of large frugivores. Finally, our results support the idea that the range of diversity levels in some rare tree species may resemble those of dense widespread tree species and that very low density is not a good predictor of the level of gene diversity (Gitzendanner & Soltis 2000; Navarro et al. 2005).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Nowadays, long‐distance seed dispersal may not be ensured in many regions of Central Africa where hunting has drastically decreased populations of large frugivores. Finally, our results support the idea that the range of diversity levels in some rare tree species may resemble those of dense widespread tree species and that very low density is not a good predictor of the level of gene diversity (Gitzendanner & Soltis 2000; Navarro et al. 2005).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%