2011
DOI: 10.1134/s1061830911020094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choice of the parameters and algorithm for the magnetic hardness testing of thermally treated carbon steels by the method of regression modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As it follows from the obtained results, the field H p correlates with the calculated field H A ; however, H p can be easily measured with existing devices unlike H A [14,15]. Thus, it is possible to test the depth of the hardened layer by the magnetic field value measured on the surface of a locally magnetized object.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As it follows from the obtained results, the field H p correlates with the calculated field H A ; however, H p can be easily measured with existing devices unlike H A [14,15]. Thus, it is possible to test the depth of the hardened layer by the magnetic field value measured on the surface of a locally magnetized object.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…To define a more appropriate inspection parameter, field intensity H p is measured by a SIMTEST device [14,15]. This field is achieved in the center of the interpolar space (point A) on the surface of two-layer objects after they are magnetized by a U-shaped electromagnet with subsequent magnetization reversal along the descending hysteresis loop branch until reaching a fixed magnetic flux value [16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value σ F shows how the use of the second parameter x 2 to determine the value of F decreases (if σ F < 1) or increases (if σ F > 1) the SD of the indirect measurement according to equation (3) compared to using only the parameter x 1 . In the notation (7), from (6) we obtain: Figure 1 shows the results of calculating the dependences σ F = σ F (σ 2 ) by formula (8) in the range 0 ≤ σ 2 ≤ 3 for different coefficients R of the correlation between the parameters x 1 and x 2 in the possible range -1 ≤ R ≤ 1 of its change. Figure 2 shows the results of calculating the dependences by σ F = σ F (R) formula (8) at different values in the range of -1 ≤ R ≤ 1.…”
Section: Analysis and Its Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To increase the reliability of magnetic structural analysis, a combined use of several magnetic parameters was proposed. Analysis of the theoretical foundations of such methods, experiments, and modeling showed a strong influence of errors in measuring the parameters used in multiparameter regression equations on the reliability of control [6][7][8][9][10]. Nevertheless, multi-parameter models are used to calculate the hardness of HRC steels [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is becoming increasingly urgent to developing techniques and devices enabling one measure locally a whole complex of magnetic characteristics, i.е. to perform multiparameter diagnostics [2,3]. However, multiparameter testing and diagnostics, based on measuring both magnetic parameters and characteristics associated with the dynamics of the rearrangement of the domain structure during magnetization reversal, can provide a more reliable determination of residual stresses and the structural-phase state [1,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%