1973
DOI: 10.1016/0048-3575(73)90101-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cholinergic receptors of the central nervous system of insects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1976
1976
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data point to differences between the nicotinic ACh receptors of fish electric organs and the housefly brain putative ACh receptors. First is the apparent in vitro lower affinity of the latter for cholinergic drugs and ACh (Eldefrawi and O 'Brien, 1970;Aziz and Eldefrawi, 1973), unless we consider the hypothesis that the in vitro higher affinity binding of ACh and activators observed to electric organ ACh receptors is due to in vitro desensitization of these receptors (Weber et al, 1975). The lack of effect on [3H]decamethonium or [3H]nicotine binding to the housefly S2 fraction by a-BGT or the specific neurotoxin of N. naja siamensis venom (Table I), and the apparent absence of their direct binding of [125I]a-BGT (Figure 3), point to additional differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data point to differences between the nicotinic ACh receptors of fish electric organs and the housefly brain putative ACh receptors. First is the apparent in vitro lower affinity of the latter for cholinergic drugs and ACh (Eldefrawi and O 'Brien, 1970;Aziz and Eldefrawi, 1973), unless we consider the hypothesis that the in vitro higher affinity binding of ACh and activators observed to electric organ ACh receptors is due to in vitro desensitization of these receptors (Weber et al, 1975). The lack of effect on [3H]decamethonium or [3H]nicotine binding to the housefly S2 fraction by a-BGT or the specific neurotoxin of N. naja siamensis venom (Table I), and the apparent absence of their direct binding of [125I]a-BGT (Figure 3), point to additional differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%