2001
DOI: 10.1177/107179190100800203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choosing Leaders: A Group Interactional Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three types of community leaders may be distinguished: (1) institutional leaders, who are appointed to a formal position of leadership (Anderson & Wasserman, 2001); (2) the power elite, who attain the authority to lead as a result of their social or economic standing in the community (Czudnowski, 1983); and (3) grassroots leaders, who emerge from within the community and work as volunteers without monetary remuneration. (Castelloe, Watson, & White, 2001;Gittell, Ortega-Mustamante, & Steffy, 2000;Greenberg, 2000).…”
Section: Community Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three types of community leaders may be distinguished: (1) institutional leaders, who are appointed to a formal position of leadership (Anderson & Wasserman, 2001); (2) the power elite, who attain the authority to lead as a result of their social or economic standing in the community (Czudnowski, 1983); and (3) grassroots leaders, who emerge from within the community and work as volunteers without monetary remuneration. (Castelloe, Watson, & White, 2001;Gittell, Ortega-Mustamante, & Steffy, 2000;Greenberg, 2000).…”
Section: Community Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is frequently assumed that deans are good "academics" therefore, they it is assumed that they are going to be qualified to lead an academic operation unit. The crossover of academic role and skills could be considered to be very different from the skills required to be an effective leader (Anderson and Wasserman, 2001;Harvey et al, 2006;Gibney and Shang, 2007;Davies, 2010).…”
Section: Literature On Selecting Academic Deansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question becomes, "is this really the best way to select a dean and are we getting what we deserve by continuing to follow such a convoluted process for selecting deans?" (Anderson and Wasserman, 2001). Having done that, we then can move on to the "mistakes" section.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%