2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2013.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choquet optimal set in biobjective combinatorial optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, we assume that the DM's preferences can be represented by a parameterized scalarizing function (e.g., a weighted sum), allowing some tradeoff between the objectives, but the corresponding preference parameters (e.g., the weights) are initially not known; hence, we have to consider the set of all parameters compatible with the collected preference information. An interesting approach to deal with preference imprecision has been recently developed [20,22,31] and consists in determining the possibly optimal solutions, that is the solutions that are optimal for at least one instance of the preference parameters. The main drawback of this approach, though, is that the number of possibly optimal solutions may still be very large compared to the number of Paretooptimal solutions; therefore there is a need for elicitation methods aiming to specify the preference model by asking preference queries to the DM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we assume that the DM's preferences can be represented by a parameterized scalarizing function (e.g., a weighted sum), allowing some tradeoff between the objectives, but the corresponding preference parameters (e.g., the weights) are initially not known; hence, we have to consider the set of all parameters compatible with the collected preference information. An interesting approach to deal with preference imprecision has been recently developed [20,22,31] and consists in determining the possibly optimal solutions, that is the solutions that are optimal for at least one instance of the preference parameters. The main drawback of this approach, though, is that the number of possibly optimal solutions may still be very large compared to the number of Paretooptimal solutions; therefore there is a need for elicitation methods aiming to specify the preference model by asking preference queries to the DM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%