2016
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2016.00103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choreographing the Double Strand Break Response: Ubiquitin and SUMO Control of Nuclear Architecture

Abstract: The cellular response to DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) is a multifaceted signaling program that centers on post-translational modifications including phosphorylation, ubiquitylation and SUMOylation. In this review we discuss how ubiquitin and SUMO orchestrate the recognition of DSBs and explore how this influences chromatin organization. We discuss functional outcomes of this response including transcriptional silencing and how pre-existing chromatin states may control the DSB response and the maintenance of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 139 publications
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the wealth of phosphorylation targets in the DDR, the number of known ubiquitylation substrates at DSB sites is small (Harding and Greenberg, 2016). While K63-linked ubiquitylation mediates functional alterations of the target protein, K48linked ubiquitin chains mark target proteins for proteasomemediated degradation (Walczak et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the wealth of phosphorylation targets in the DDR, the number of known ubiquitylation substrates at DSB sites is small (Harding and Greenberg, 2016). While K63-linked ubiquitylation mediates functional alterations of the target protein, K48linked ubiquitin chains mark target proteins for proteasomemediated degradation (Walczak et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the complexity, this is a fine-tuned process that brings each DDR protein to the protein conglomerates spanning DSB sites at the precise time and location to perform the ultimate task: smooth and streamlined DSB repair. The importance of tight regulation of protein ubiquitylation in this process has been noted (Harding and Greenberg, 2016; Lee et al, 2017; Panier and Durocher, 2013). A primary level of this regulation is the universal balance between the relevant E3 ligases and opposing deubiquitylating proteases (DUBs) (Pellegrino and Altmeyer, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many players in the DSB response relocate to DSB sites, where they form large protein hubs (Lukas et al, 2011). These proteins typically undergo post-translational modifications (PTMs), primarily poly(ADP-ribosylation), phosphorylation, and modification by the ubiquitin family proteins, which set them up to operate in the DDR (Harding and Greenberg, 2016; Lee et al, 2017; Martin-Hernandez et al, 2017; Polo and Jackson, 2011; Shiloh and Ziv, 2013a; Wilson and Durocher, 2017). This massive protein recruitment is a highly structured process, in which the damage-induced PTMs often establish interactions among the proteins to help mobilize and correctly locate the next-in-line recruits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations