2000
DOI: 10.1364/josaa.17.000232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromatic contrast sensitivity: the role of absolute threshold and gain constant in differences between the fovea and the periphery

Abstract: A model of foveal achromatic and chromatic sensitivity [Vision Res. 36, 1597 (1996)] was extended to the peripheral visual field. Threshold-versus-illuminance functions were analyzed to determine effects of eccentricity on absolute thresholds and gain constants of chromatic and luminance mechanisms. The resulting peripheral model successfully predicted peripheral contrast sensitivity as a function of wavelength, for both white and 500-nm backgrounds. We conclude that the short-wavelength-sensitive cone opponen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(181 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Foveal SWS cone mediated sensitivities On theroretical grounds, 21 the SWAP sensitivities in the visual field periphery were expected to depend on at least three factors involving SWS cone mediated sensitivity: (1) the rate of sensitivity decline with increasing eccentricity, (2) the baseline sensitivity level-that is, the sensitivity level at yellow background illuminances too dim to induce appreciable sensitivity loss, and (3) an adaptation factor-that is, the degree of desensitisation induced by the yellow background for SWAP. For modelling purposes, the first of these three factors was represented by the reduction of SWAP sensitivity from the second to the third ring.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Foveal SWS cone mediated sensitivities On theroretical grounds, 21 the SWAP sensitivities in the visual field periphery were expected to depend on at least three factors involving SWS cone mediated sensitivity: (1) the rate of sensitivity decline with increasing eccentricity, (2) the baseline sensitivity level-that is, the sensitivity level at yellow background illuminances too dim to induce appreciable sensitivity loss, and (3) an adaptation factor-that is, the degree of desensitisation induced by the yellow background for SWAP. For modelling purposes, the first of these three factors was represented by the reduction of SWAP sensitivity from the second to the third ring.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 These determinants were assessed by relating SWS cone mediated sensitivities from the fovea and central portions of the visual field to SWAP sensitivities in the periphery. A multilinear regression model of peripheral SWAP sensitivities is presented in the second part of the Results section.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41,44 This is because P cells are much more responsive to chromatic modulation than to luminance; therefore, if P cells mediated detection for the white luminance increments, the sensitivity difference between opponent and non-opponent mechanisms would be much larger. 45 However, this is not the case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presently, there is only limited information concerning these types of comparisons. 39 The extent to which the results in this study would apply to other healthy populations is unknown. It is possible, for example, that adaptation properties would depend on retinal locus in a way that would invalidate or compromise the use of foveally based models for any of the following populations: men, young women (for whom there is cyclic hormonal change), postmenopausal women using hormone replacement, or the elderly (for whom the hill of vision steepens 6 ).…”
Section: Generality Of Foveally Based Models For Describing the Visuamentioning
confidence: 95%