2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.02.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromatographic characterisation of ordered mesoporous silicas. Part II: Acceptor–donor properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DN-values are calculated by calorimetric measurements from the sorption of the probe molecules (electron donor) onto SbCl 5 (electron acceptor). AN-values are derived by 31 P NMR measurements from the chemical shift of Et 3 PO (electron donor) in the presence of an electron acceptor [57][58][59][60]. The enthalpy of sorption ΔH sp ads is obtained by IGC (using at least three different temperatures) with the following equation:…”
Section: Inverse Gas Chromatography (Igc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DN-values are calculated by calorimetric measurements from the sorption of the probe molecules (electron donor) onto SbCl 5 (electron acceptor). AN-values are derived by 31 P NMR measurements from the chemical shift of Et 3 PO (electron donor) in the presence of an electron acceptor [57][58][59][60]. The enthalpy of sorption ΔH sp ads is obtained by IGC (using at least three different temperatures) with the following equation:…”
Section: Inverse Gas Chromatography (Igc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A straight line with the slope of K A is obtained by plotting ΔHnormalASP/AN* against DN/AN* where DN denotes the donor number given by Gutmann and AN* is the acceptor number modified by Fowkes . The values of the constants K A and K D calculated in this way are theoretically independent on the column temperature in spite of the fact that some researchers have proposed temperature can change acidic properties of a material . Although precise values were given in the literature, relative errors of K D can be larger because it is determined from the intercept of the straight line.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%