Since Nakamura and co-workers demonstrated zirconia as a packing material suitable for high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), 1-3 a great deal of attention has been paid to its application to HPLC. However, the applicability of this material is usually limited by the fact that there exist Bronsted acid sites, Bronsted basic sites and Lewis acid sites on the surface of zirconia, which can lead to irreversible adsorption of some compounds which should be separated. 4 Therefore, modification of this material is required to block such irreversible adsorption.Many efforts have been made to develop modified-zirconia packing materials for HPLC. Trudinger et al. 5 and Yu et al. 6 have tried to prepare chemically bonded zirconia with silanes for hydrophobic and hydrophilic stationary phases. However, Zr-O-Si bonds are quite unstable compared with Si-O-Si bonds. 5,7 Carr and co-workers have extensively studied carbon [8][9][10] and polymers 11-15 coatings on zirconia as surface modifiers of zirconia to create anion-exchange, hydrophobic and hydrophilictype phases with varying degrees of success. Since bare zirconia has a great affinity for Lewis bases, Carr and coworkers have studied modification of zirconia with Lewis bases such as fluoride, 16 phosphate 17 and ethylenediamine-N,N′-tetramethylphosphonic acid (EDTPA), 18 and their application in separation of proteins. We have studied preparation of spherical zirconia by sol-gel process 19 and modification of zirconia with stearic acid as reversed-phase for HPLC. 20 Nevertheless, low column efficiency was obtained due to low surface area and poor pore structure of the zirconia.Particle pore characteristics are crucial factors for chromatographic performance. 21,22 Nawrocki and co-workers have described the changes in surface area, pore size, and pore volume of zirconia with thermal treatment. 23 Carr and co-workers have compared the pore structures of zirconia synthesized with oil emulsion (OEM) and polymerization-induced colloidal aggregation (PICA) methods by means of nitrogen sorptometry, mercury porosimetry, size exclusion chromatography and NMR techniques. [24][25][26] They pointed out that nitrogen sorptometry and mercury porosimetry indicated a significant difference in pore volume and pore size distribution, and the presence of a considerable number of pore constrictions for the zirconia synthesized with the different methods. However, NMR results indicated that they have same average pore size and tortuosity. 25 Shalliker and Douglas have reported that the pore diameters, surface area and pore volumes of zirconia could be controlled by sodium chloride impregnation technique, and indicated that poor quality of pore structures was obtained without sodium chloride. 27 The crystalline phase of zirconia has also been shown to influence the surface area. Shalliker et al. have recently prepared spherical silica-zirconia composites by coating zirconia microspheres with silica. Their results illustrated that addition of the silica onto the zirconia microspheres ...