1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2280(1998)32:4<331::aid-em6>3.0.co;2-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromosomal response of insect and mammalian cells to streptonigrin: A comparative study

Abstract: We assessed the chromosomal response of insect (mosquito, Aedes albopictus) and mammalian (Chinese hamster ovary, CHO) cells to streptonigrin (SN). Both types of cells were pulse‐treated for 20 min with increasing doses of SN and the frequency of chromosome aberrations and sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) for each SN dose was determined. Our results show that the SN doses inducing remarkable chromosome damage (expressed as frequency of aberrations per cell and per chromosome) in CHO cells fail to produce a si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the log phase of growth, the cells were treated for 20 min with SN (Sigma, CAS number 3930-19-6) at the concentrations indicated below. The concentrations employed were based on previous studies carried out in our laboratory [Bolzán et al, 1998[Bolzán et al, , 2001b. At the end of the pulse treatment with the drug, the cells were washed twice with Hank's balanced salt solution and kept in culture with fresh culture medium containing 10 g/ml BrdUrd (Sigma, CAS number 59-14-3) until harvesting.…”
Section: Cell Culture Drug Treatments and Cell Harvestingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the log phase of growth, the cells were treated for 20 min with SN (Sigma, CAS number 3930-19-6) at the concentrations indicated below. The concentrations employed were based on previous studies carried out in our laboratory [Bolzán et al, 1998[Bolzán et al, , 2001b. At the end of the pulse treatment with the drug, the cells were washed twice with Hank's balanced salt solution and kept in culture with fresh culture medium containing 10 g/ml BrdUrd (Sigma, CAS number 59-14-3) until harvesting.…”
Section: Cell Culture Drug Treatments and Cell Harvestingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, although the clastogenic effects of SN are well documented [DuFrain et al, 1980;DuFrain, 1983;Wasserman et al, 1990;Linscombe et al, 1991;Testoni et al, 1993Testoni et al, , 1995Testoni et al, , 1996Bolzán et al, 1998a], the mechanism by which this compound induces chromosome damage has not yet been fully elucidated. In a first attempt to determine the mechanism underlying the clastogenic action of SN, we recently investigated the effect of several antioxidant compounds on the yield of chromosomal aberrations (CAs) induced by this antibiotic on CHO cells [Testoni et al, 1997].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%