1970
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1970.46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromosome rearrangements in the hexaploid oats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

1971
1971
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the situation among the variable strigosa forms, a considerable amount of chromosomal variation (translocations) was detected among wild and cultivated sativa oats (LADIZINSKY, 1970a) . Here also hybrids are almost fully fertile .…”
Section: A Murphyi Ladizmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Similar to the situation among the variable strigosa forms, a considerable amount of chromosomal variation (translocations) was detected among wild and cultivated sativa oats (LADIZINSKY, 1970a) . Here also hybrids are almost fully fertile .…”
Section: A Murphyi Ladizmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Difficulties have included a lack of sequence data, the large size and complexity of the genome [4], and instability of aneuploid mapping stocks. Unlike other common polyploids, colinearity among oat subgenomes is disrupted by numerous chromosomal rearrangements [5][9], thus diploid relatives have provided limited guidance for map construction. Prior genotyping in oat has relied heavily on DNA manipulation, hybridization, and size-discrimination [10][12], with heterogeneous results that are poorly integrated among different mapping populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with other food crops, construction of a genetic linkage map through advanced molecular markers in cultivated oat has been constrained by several obstacles such as (i) polyploid nature and the presence of the large regions of repetitive DNA (Rines et al, 2006;Molnar et al, 2011); (ii) chromosome rearrangements such as intergenomic translocations (Ladizinsky, 1970;Jellen et al, 1994;Hayasaki et al, 2000;Linares et al, 2000;Sanz et al, 2010;Gutierrez-Gonzalez and Garvin, 2011); and (iii) occasional homeologous pairing during meiosis that can confound correct ordering of markers (Singh and Kolb. The occurrence of BYDV in a field is largely dependent on the activity of its vectors.…”
Section: Winter Forage Oat-breeding Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%