1987
DOI: 10.1037/h0085695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronic ambivalence: An individual and marital problem.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ambivalence is defined as simultaneous attraction to and repulsion from an action, inhibiting individuals who experience it from making decisions and taking action [2]. Billig et al [1] explore the dilemmas in everyday life, describing the inner dialogue that individuals use to balance the gains and losses between options and highlighting the importance of the presentation and awareness of choices to the process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ambivalence is defined as simultaneous attraction to and repulsion from an action, inhibiting individuals who experience it from making decisions and taking action [2]. Billig et al [1] explore the dilemmas in everyday life, describing the inner dialogue that individuals use to balance the gains and losses between options and highlighting the importance of the presentation and awareness of choices to the process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discipline of psychology has long been concerned with ambivalence, for example in mental health problems, where it may manifest in chronic ambivalence and splitting (e.g. Akhtar and Byrne, 1983; Braverman, 1987). Today, however, ambivalence is also studied as a common experience in everyday life that may arise in both mundane and dramatic, emotionally intense situations (Ersner-Hershfield et al, 2008; Larsen et al, 2001; Larsen and McGraw, 2011; Laurenceau et al, 2005).…”
Section: Student Ambivalence In the Transition To Universitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conndis and McMullin () assert that ambivalence has been conceptualised at two levels: psychological and sociological. The psychological definition is arguably the most dominant, referring to an individual experience that involves a ‘simultaneous attraction towards and a repulsion from’ something or someone that manifests in feelings of discomfort (Braverman, , p. 85). Conversely, sociological ambivalence has been used less frequently as a conceptual tool (Hillcoat‐Nammétamby and Phillips, ), but potentially has a lot to offer how we understand children’s experiences of death due to its emphasis on the interaction between social relations and structural influences (ibid).…”
Section: Death: Taboo Versus Ambivalencementioning
confidence: 99%