2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10802-017-0279-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronic Stressors and Adolescents’ Externalizing Problems: Genetic Moderation by Dopamine Receptor D4. The TRAILS Study

Abstract: The existing literature does not provide consistent evidence that carriers of the Dopamine D4 Receptor 7-repeat allele are more sensitive to adverse environmental influences, resulting in enhanced externalizing problems, compared to noncarriers. One explanation is that the adverse influences examined in prior studies were not severe, chronic, or distressing enough to reveal individual differences in sensitivity reflected by DRD4–7R. This study examined whether the 7-repeat allele moderated the association betw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(76 reference statements)
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, a genomic aggregate approach better reflects sensitivity as a heterogeneous phenotype in that the markers that make up the score capture multiple facets of sensitivity. Related to this point is the finding that DRD4 played a relatively weak role in the relation between peer and adolescent conduct problem behaviors, which reflects the inconsistency in the larger literature with regard to DRD4 moderation of peer influences (Kretschmer et al, 2013; Zandstra et al, 2018) and suggests that DRD4 variation and its often‐hypothesized sensitivity phenotype (reward sensitivity) may be less relevant than 5‐HTTLPR and GABRA2 for differences in sensitivity to peer antisocial behavior as it relates to adolescents’ own antisocial behavior. Although DRD4 variation is linked to environmental sensitivity, broadly defined, the specific form of sensitivity may be less important for the relation presently studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, a genomic aggregate approach better reflects sensitivity as a heterogeneous phenotype in that the markers that make up the score capture multiple facets of sensitivity. Related to this point is the finding that DRD4 played a relatively weak role in the relation between peer and adolescent conduct problem behaviors, which reflects the inconsistency in the larger literature with regard to DRD4 moderation of peer influences (Kretschmer et al, 2013; Zandstra et al, 2018) and suggests that DRD4 variation and its often‐hypothesized sensitivity phenotype (reward sensitivity) may be less relevant than 5‐HTTLPR and GABRA2 for differences in sensitivity to peer antisocial behavior as it relates to adolescents’ own antisocial behavior. Although DRD4 variation is linked to environmental sensitivity, broadly defined, the specific form of sensitivity may be less important for the relation presently studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These analyses were conducted with consideration of the association between DRD4 and novelty and reward seeking behaviors (He, Martin, Zhu, & Liu, 2018;Stice, Yokum, Burger, Epstein, & Smolen, 2012) that may make adolescents more susceptible to negative peer influence. There is some disagreement, however, about the putative susceptibility variant and the chronicity of environmental conditions required to demonstrate sensitivity (Kretschmer et al, 2013;Zandstra, Ormel, Hoekstra, & Hartman, 2018). Importantly, no studies have examined whether DRD4 moderates the link between peer and adolescent conduct problem behaviors specifically.…”
Section: Genetic Moderation Of Peer Associations On Adolescent Conducmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reliability of the instrument is .79 for the social competence scales; .78 to .97 for the specific behavior scales; and for the total scales .95. This list has been used in multicultural studies (Guerrera et al, 2019;Muetzel et al, 2018;Zandstra et al, 2018) was validated with Colombian population by Hewitt Ramirez, Jaimes, Vera, & Villa (Hewitt Ramírez et al, 2012) and used in the Colombian population (Hewitt Ramírez et al, 2014;Sánchez-Villegas et al, 2020;Trejos et al, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In humans, this variant has been associated with reduced gene expression and efficiency 7,8 and acts as a susceptibility marker of dopamine‐related genes 6 . Carriers of this variant have an increased risk of developing externalizing problems in relation to parental insensitivity 9 and chronic stress 10 . However, these individuals also benefitted most from enhanced positive parenting 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%