2009
DOI: 10.7202/019719ar
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chukotka’s Indigenous intellectuals and subversion of Indigenous activism in the 1990s

Abstract: This paper, based on the author’s extensive field research in Chukotka in the 1990s, examines the conditions for Indigenous activism in Chukotka during the decade following the dissolution of the Soviet Union. The Indigenous movement in Chukotka faced extremely difficult conditions in the 1990s because of a concerted attack by a belligerent and chauvinistic regional administration that sought to undermine any effort on the part of Indigenous activists to mount an effective movement.Se fondant sur une recherche… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Land belongs to the state, and in the wider context of human rights and legal pluralism, the concept of indigenous rights has a weak conceptual and legal foundation (Novikova 2003(Novikova , 2014Rohr 2014, and many reports in English by the same publisher). Regional conditions vary: Fondahl (1998) discusses Evenki land tenure struggles around Lake Baikal; Gray (2007) shows how Chukotka swung during the 1990s from a hostile administration to an extraordinary (but temporary) period of support by the oligarch Abramovich (Thompson 2008). Occasional reports show a surprising and heartening possibility of coexistence between indigenous communities and industrial enterprises at the local level, but these oases of local goodwill (Stammler & Peskov 2008) are not carried through to the national level.…”
Section: Post-soviet Internationalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Land belongs to the state, and in the wider context of human rights and legal pluralism, the concept of indigenous rights has a weak conceptual and legal foundation (Novikova 2003(Novikova , 2014Rohr 2014, and many reports in English by the same publisher). Regional conditions vary: Fondahl (1998) discusses Evenki land tenure struggles around Lake Baikal; Gray (2007) shows how Chukotka swung during the 1990s from a hostile administration to an extraordinary (but temporary) period of support by the oligarch Abramovich (Thompson 2008). Occasional reports show a surprising and heartening possibility of coexistence between indigenous communities and industrial enterprises at the local level, but these oases of local goodwill (Stammler & Peskov 2008) are not carried through to the national level.…”
Section: Post-soviet Internationalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indigenous rights were restricted to local administration and matters of selfgovernment (Gray, 2001). Yupiget intelligentsia, who were previously social activists within the Soviet Union, naturally became social activists within the context of the Russian Federation (Gray, 2007). From the onset of the 1990s, the emergence of the Indigenous rights movement was supported at the Okrug level; however, a wave of opposition to regionalism swept across Russia within the decade (Pelaudeix, 2012).…”
Section: Political Developments In Chukotkamentioning
confidence: 99%